Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?
- Conditions
- PainPostoperative ComplicationsRelapseMigration of Implant
- Registration Number
- NCT06070142
- Lead Sponsor
- Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş
- Brief Summary
Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate.
One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation.
In the eTEP technique, dissection is performed in a larger area than in TEP. For this reason, it can be thought that the possibility of mesh displacement is higher in the eTEP procedure. The purpose of this study is to confirm this idea with a prospective study. There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. However, there is no study on mesh detection in the eTEP technique. The aim of the study is to compare patients who underwent without mesh fixation laparoscopic TEP and eTEP repair in terms of clinical data such as mesh displacement and hernia recurrence, chronic pain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Patients with unilateral inguinal hernias,
- Patients aged 18-65.
- Younger than 18 years, and older than 65 years,
- Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias,
- Recurrent hernias,
- Patients with bilateral inguinal hernias,
- Patients who are contraindicated to receive general anesthesia,
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Status of Mesh Displacement postoperative 24 hours, 1 and 6 months Patients who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of Hernia recurrence postoperative 6th month hernia recurrence after six months of follow-up. It will be checked by physical examination. Imaging methods will be used in suspicious cases.
Rate of Chronic pain postoperative 1st and 6th month It will be measured using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patient will be asked to choose between the number 1 with the least pain and the number 10 with the most pain. The lowest score on this scale is 1, and the highest score is 10.
Rate of Postoperative complications postoperative 24 hours and 1st month such as wound infection, bleeding
Rate of Postoperative pain postoperative 24 hours It will be measured using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patient will be asked to choose between the number 1 with the least pain and the number 10 with the most pain. The lowest score on this scale is 1, and the highest score is 10.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Health Science Van Training and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Van, Turkey
University of Health Science Van Training and Research Hospital🇹🇷Van, Turkey