MedPath

The Outcome After Lichtenstein Operation vs. ProGrip Patch Repair of Inguinal Hernia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Inguinal Hernia
Primary
Unilateral
Interventions
Device: Open inguinal hernia repair
Registration Number
NCT01026935
Lead Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Brief Summary

For the present study, 400 consecutive men with unilateral primary inguinal hernia are randomized to Lichtenstein repair using either light weight polypropylene mesh (38g/m2) or light weight ProGrip mesh. ProGrip mesh adheres to tissues with polylactic micro hooks without suturing. The primary aim is to examine, whether the ProGrip mesh produces less pain than sutured polypropylene mesh. Secondary outcomes are operation time and convalescence as well as recurrence rate. ProGrip mesh is supposed to be faster to apply as no sutures are needed, which may compensate for its higher cost. The patients are blinded to which mesh they receive.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
398
Inclusion Criteria
  • primary unilateral inguinal hernia
Exclusion Criteria
  • not willing to participate
  • not capable to understand or fill in the questionnaires

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
sutured meshOpen inguinal hernia repair200 patients are randomized to inguinal hernia repair with sutured light weight (38g/m2) polypropylene mesh (Lichtenstein repair)
non-sutured meshOpen inguinal hernia repair200 patients are randomized to receive a light weight mesh that adheres to tissues with polylactic micro hooks without sutures
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
postoperative complaintsOne year
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrence rateOne year

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

HUCH Surgical Hospital, Dept of Surgery

🇫🇮

Helsinki, Finland

HUCH Jorvi Hospital, department of Surgery

🇫🇮

Espoo, Finland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath