CardioInsight 1 RBBB
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Interventions
- Device: Electrical Activation Mapping Guided Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT05555966
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for symptomatic heart failure patients. However, there are still 30 to 40% of studied patients being nonresponder to CRT. The plausible reasons of lack of effect of CRT in these patients include relative less baseline electrical dyssynchrony. The aim of our study is to investigate whether there is an optimal configuration of CRT delivery that varies between patients with different pattern of activation delay.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 93
- Adult (aged 18 or above) of both sexes
- Ischemic or non-ischemic cause of heart failure
- QRS duration > 120 ms, non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) type of conduction disturbance
- NYHA class III or above
- Informed consent by the patient
- Already received stable dose of guideline directed medical therapy for at least 3 months
- LBBB patients
- Pregnant women
- Participation in another study
- Patient with contraindication to left ventricle catheterization by a retrograde aortic approach
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Tailor-made CRT delivery Electrical Activation Mapping Guided Cardiac resynchronization therapy Device placement based on Electrical Activation Mapping result
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Left Ventricle (LV) end systolic volume reduction 6 months The responder rate of greater than 10% of LV end systolic volume reduction measured by echocardiogram
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Echocardiogram parameter: left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume 6 months left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume at baseline, 3 months and 6 months : , left ventricular ejection fraction, degree of mitral regurgitation, strain imaging will be aggregated to arrive at an overall change in echocardiogram parameters as together they represent integrated heart function collectively, as reflected by the listed echocardiogram parameters.
Hemodynamic response monitoring During procedure monitor the difference in hemodynamic responses of different methods of CRT delivery method. The hemodynamic response will be maximal dp/dt as measured by pressure wire introduced into the left ventricle during the procedure.
Cine images and chest X ray 6 months Cine images (PA, LAO 300, RAO 300) and Chest X ray (PA view) of patients will be obtained for evaluation of changes in disease
Multi-dimensional Quality of life changes 6 months change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, 6 minute hall walk test, HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire and quality of life using Minnesota's living with heart failure (MLWHF) questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Electrical dyssynchrony index During procedure The acute electrical dyssynchrony indices (the standard deviation of activation times throughout the epicardium) of different methods of CRT delivery. Lower indicate larger improvement.
Procedure outcome with optimal CRT delivery During procedure Procedure outcome measured by procedure duration and implantation success rate of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical dyssynchrony indices.
Device set-up parameter :defibrillation sensitivity 6 months Device set-up parameter :defibrillation sensitivity at implant and 6 months follow-up
Change in 6 minute hall walk test 6 months Change in 6 minute hall walk test result, at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Implantation success rate with optimal CRT delivery During procedure Implantation success rate of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical dyssynchrony indices.
Post-operation Complication rate 6 months Peri-operative and 6 months follow-up complications rate:
1. Thromboembolic event
2. Dislodgement and migration of pacing leads
3. Phrenic nerve stimulation
4. OthersEchocardiogram parameter: strain imaging 6 months Echocardiogram parameter: strain imaging at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Change in HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire 6 months HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Device set-up parameter :defibrillation threshold 6 months Device parameters including defibrillation threshold at implant and 6 months follow-up.
Device set-up parameter: lead impedance of pacing leads 6 months Device set-up parameter: lead impedance of pacing leads at implant and 6 months follow-up
Echocardiogram parameter: left ventricular ejection fraction 6 months Echocardiogram parameter: left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Echocardiogram parameter: degree of mitral regurgitation 6 months Echocardiogram parameter: degree of mitral regurgitation at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Change in quality of life 6 months Change in quality of life assessed by Minnesota's living with heart failure (MLWHF) questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡°Shatin, Hong Kong