CardioInsight 2 - Non-responder
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Interventions
- Device: Electrical Activation Mapping Guided Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT05555992
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is proven to improve survival and heart function of patient with certain electrical conduction abnormality and heart failure. However, in patient with certain electrical conduction abnormality, being nonresponder is observed in up to 40% in patient receiving CRT. Conventionally the surgical approach of CRT is to implant one pacing lead in the right heart and one in the left heart to resynchronize the contraction and the pacing lead in the left heart is usually placed in the posterior or lateral portion of the left heart. However, this single approach may not be optimal, especially for those patients with conduction abnormality known to have no response to CRT. Purpose of the clinical investigation. The purpose of the Electrical Activation Guided CRT for Nonresponders Study is to study the effectiveness of an addition of Hisbundle pacing approach to CRT nonresponder by direct His-bundle pacing to improve the responder rate of nonresponder of conventional CRT and a tailored made approach to CRT procedure by using a noninvasive globally mapping system studying the electrical conduction under different approaches to delivery CRT. The pacing approach that optimally corrects conduction abnormality will be determined before the actual addition of new lead procedure.
Conduct of the Investigation This study will include 18 patients already implanted with device delivering conventional CRT that known to have no response to the conventional CRT after 6 months of the CRT therapy from Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong. You will be followed in the device clinic as per usual care after your participation in the study is completed.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 18
- Adult (aged 18 or above) of both sexes
- Ischemic or non-ischemic cause of heart failure
- QRS duration > 120 ms, non -LBBB type of conduction disturbance
- NYHA class III or above
- Informed consent by the patient
- Already received stable dose of guideline directed medical therapy for at least 3 months
- LBBB patients
- Pregnant women
- Participation in another study
- Patient with contraindication to left ventricle catheterization by a retrograde aortic approach
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treatment Electrical Activation Mapping Guided Cardiac resynchronization therapy -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Left Ventricle end systolic volume reduction 6 months The responder rate of greater than 10% of LV end systolic volume reduction measured by echocardiogram.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hemodynamic response monitoring During procedure Monitor the difference in hemodynamic responses of different methods of CRT delivery. The hemodynamic response will be maximal dp/dt as measured by pressure wire introduced into the left ventricle during the procedure.
Cine images and chest X ray 6 months Cine images (PA, LAO 300, RAO 300) and Chest X ray (PA view) of patients will be obtained for evaluation of changes in disease
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume 6 months Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Device set-up parameter: defibrillation threshold 6 months Device parameters including defibrillation threshold at implant and 6 months follow-up.
Change in quality of life 6 months Change in quality of life assessed by Minnesota's living with heart failure (MLWHF) questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Electrical desynchrony index During procedure The acute electrical desynchrony indices (the standard deviation of activation times throughout the epicardium) of different methods of CRT delivery. Lower indicate larger improvement.
Change in 6 minute hall walk test 6 months Compare result of 6 minute hall walk test at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Device set-up parameter: lead impedance 6 months Device parameters including lead impedance of pacing leads at implant and 6 months follow-up.
Procedure duration of different methods of CRT delivery During procedure Procedure duration of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical desynchrony indices.
Implantation success rate of different methods of CRT delivery During procedure Implantation success rate of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical desynchrony indices.
Device set-up parameter: defibrillation sensitivity 6 months Device parameters including defibrillation sensitivity at implant and 6 months follow-up.
Echocardiogram parameters: degree of mitral regurgitation 6 months Echocardiogram parameter: degree of mitral regurgitation at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Post-operation Complication rate 6 months Peri-operative and 6 months follow-up complications rate:
1. Thromboembolic event
2. Dislodgement and migration of pacing leads
3. Phrenic nerve stimulation
4. OthersEchocardiogram parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction 6 months Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: strain imaging 6 months Echocardiogram parameters: strain imaging at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 6 months Overall changes in QoL measured by change in NYHA class at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Change in HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire 6 months Compare result of HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡°Shatin, Hong Kong