MedPath

Effect of Breathing Circuits on Intraoperative Body Temperature

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Brain Tumor
Interventions
Device: Group C
Device: Group E
Device: Group M
Registration Number
NCT01831843
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

To evaluate differences in intraoperative body temperature between heated huimid breathing circuit and conventional breathing circuit

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
111
Inclusion Criteria
  • aged 18-70 years,
  • ASA I or II
  • patients scheduled for craniotomy under general anesthesia
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • ASA III or IV
  • Duration of anesthesia time less than 4 hours
  • emergency operation
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group CGroup Cnon-heated, non-humidified conventional breathing circuit was used in group C patient
Group EGroup Ebreathing tube which apply humidity and heat (Evaqua™ Breathing Circuits manufactured by Fischer \& Paykel)was used in group E patient
Group MGroup MHeated humid tube with a warming device (Mega Acer kit manufactured by Acemedical,Seoul Korea)was used in group M patient
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
trend of changes on body temperaturefrom the point of postintubation up to 5 hours

Investigate differences on core body temperature among different kinds of circuit (heated-humid circuit, humid circuit, conventional circuit)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
total duration of airwarmer(Bair-Hurgger warming unit) using timefrom the point of postintubation up to 5hours

investigate the total duration of airwarmer using time

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath