Effect of Breathing Circuits on Intraoperative Body Temperature
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Brain Tumor
- Interventions
- Device: Group CDevice: Group EDevice: Group M
- Registration Number
- NCT01831843
- Lead Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Brief Summary
To evaluate differences in intraoperative body temperature between heated huimid breathing circuit and conventional breathing circuit
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 111
Inclusion Criteria
- aged 18-70 years,
- ASA I or II
- patients scheduled for craniotomy under general anesthesia
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
- ASA III or IV
- Duration of anesthesia time less than 4 hours
- emergency operation
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group C Group C non-heated, non-humidified conventional breathing circuit was used in group C patient Group E Group E breathing tube which apply humidity and heat (Evaqua™ Breathing Circuits manufactured by Fischer \& Paykel)was used in group E patient Group M Group M Heated humid tube with a warming device (Mega Acer kit manufactured by Acemedical,Seoul Korea)was used in group M patient
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method trend of changes on body temperature from the point of postintubation up to 5 hours Investigate differences on core body temperature among different kinds of circuit (heated-humid circuit, humid circuit, conventional circuit)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method total duration of airwarmer(Bair-Hurgger warming unit) using time from the point of postintubation up to 5hours investigate the total duration of airwarmer using time
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of