MedPath

A Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Interventions
Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Registration Number
NCT01014273
Lead Sponsor
Population Health Research Institute
Brief Summary

This is a multi-national, multi-centre, randomized study comparing the trans-radial PCI access strategy and the trans-femoral PCI access strategy in ACS patients with UA or NSTEMI or STEMI planned to be treated with an invasive strategy (PCI).

The hypothesis is that radial access site PCI will be associated with significantly less major bleeding and access site complications compared with a femoral approach, without increasing the risk of ischemic events. The overall benefit-risk profile will favor a trans-radial approach.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
7021
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Trans-femoral accessPercutaneous Coronary InterventionFemoral artery PCI access site
Trans-radial accessPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRadial artery PCI access site
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First occurrence of the composite of death, MI, stroke or non CABG major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding, other major bleeding) at 30 days.30 days
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Death, MI or strokewithin 30 days following randomization
Non CABG major bleedingwithin 30 days following randomization

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hamilton Health Sciences

🇨🇦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath