跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01014273
NCT01014273已完成3 期

An International Randomized Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral PCI Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy. An Extension to the CURRENT (OASIS 7) Substudy (EFC5695): Effect of Type of Access for PCI (Radial or Femoral) on Bleeding Rate-Substudy.

Population Health Research Institute2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 7,021 人开始时间: 2006年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
7,021
试验地点
2
主要终点
First occurrence of the composite of death, MI, stroke or non CABG major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding, other major bleeding) at 30 days.

研究概览

简要总结

This is a multi-national, multi-centre, randomized study comparing the trans-radial PCI access strategy and the trans-femoral PCI access strategy in ACS patients with UA or NSTEMI or STEMI planned to be treated with an invasive strategy (PCI).

The hypothesis is that radial access site PCI will be associated with significantly less major bleeding and access site complications compared with a femoral approach, without increasing the risk of ischemic events. The overall benefit-risk profile will favor a trans-radial approach.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

First occurrence of the composite of death, MI, stroke or non CABG major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding, other major bleeding) at 30 days.

时间窗: 30 days

次要结局

  • Non CABG major bleeding(within 30 days following randomization)
  • Death, MI or stroke(within 30 days following randomization)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验