Reducing Disparities in the Quality of Advance Care Planning for Older Adults
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseParkinson DiseaseCongestive Heart FailureAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDiabetes ComplicationsMetastatic CancerInterstitial Lung DiseaseEnd Stage Liver DiseaseEnd Stage Renal Disease
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Five Wishes FormBehavioral: Respecting Choices First Steps
- Registration Number
- NCT03516994
- Lead Sponsor
- Duke University
- Brief Summary
This study compares the effectiveness of two different approaches to advance care planning among older African Americans and older Whites living in the community. The two approaches are a structured approach with an advance care planning conversation led by a trained person using Respecting Choices (First Steps) and a patient-driven approach which includes a Five Wishes advance care planning form written in plain language. The study will determine which approach is more effective at increasing advance care planning within each racial group and reducing differences between the two groups in advance care planning.
- Detailed Description
Advance care planning (ACP) involves patients making decisions about the kind of medical care they would want to receive if they became unable to speak for themselves. Patients share their wishes in a written document (living will or healthcare proxy) and/or discuss their wishes with family, friends, and doctors. ACP improves the quality of end-of-life care by increasing the likelihood that patients receive care that reflects their preferences and values. Seriously ill African Americans are less likely to take part in advance care planning and experience lower quality care at the end of life, including poorer communication with clinicians and a lower likelihood of receiving the kind of care that they would want.
This study will include 800 seriously or chronically ill community-dwelling older adults (equal number of African Americans and whites) and their caregivers from 10 primary care practices at five medical centers in the Deep South. Eligible patients include those with cancer, advanced heart disease, advanced lung disease, end-stage kidney disease, cirrhosis, diabetes with severe complications, recurrent hospitalizations, or difficulty with basic activities of daily living. For each enrolled patient, one caregiver who is likely to assist the patient with healthcare decisions is also eligible to participate.
The goals of the study are to:
* Compare the effectiveness of two approaches to increasing formal advance care planning (completing written documents like living wills, health care proxies, medical orders for life-sustaining treatments, or other advance directives) and informal advance care planning (having conversations with doctors, family, friends, and others about wishes for future healthcare) for African Americans and for Whites.
* Determine which intervention is most effective in reducing differences between African Americans and Whites in rates of advance care planning.
* Determine whether the effectiveness of the advance care planning approach differs based on whether the person assisting with advance care planning is of the same or different race as the patient.
Administered by community health workers, the two advance care planning approaches which will be compared are:
* Patient-driven approach which includes a Five Wishes Form (advance directive written in easy to understand language)
* Structured approach with an advance care planning conversation led by a trained person using Respecting Choices (First Step) conversation guide.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 790
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patient Driven Advance Care Planning Five Wishes Form In the patient-driven advance care planning approach, patients receive a Five Wishes Form (easy to understand advance directive written in plain language), a state advance directive form, and at least two follow-up phone calls with an advance care planning contact who will answer questions. Structured Advance Care Planning Respecting Choices First Steps In the structured advance care planning approach, patients will participate in a 60 to 90 minute facilitated advance care planning conversation with a trained person using Respecting Choices (First Steps) guide and will receive a state advance directive form. The advance care planning facilitator will follow-up as needed after the session to answer additional questions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of African Americans who complete advance care planning 12 months completion of an advance care planning document (living will, healthcare proxy, medical orders, Five Wishes, other); discussion with clinician documented in chart, patient report of advance care planning discussion (designated decision-maker, discussed values, goals, preferences) with family, friends, or others
Proportion of Whites who complete advance care planning 12 months completion of an advance care planning document (living will, healthcare proxy, medical orders, Five Wishes, other); discussion with clinician documented in chart, patient report of advance care planning discussion (designated decision-maker, discussed values, goals, preferences) with family, friends, or others
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in Proportion of Whites versus African Americans who complete advance care planning 12 months Difference of proportion in whites versus African Americans who complete formal or informal advance care planning
Patient Readiness to Engage in Advance Care Planning 3 months Measure assessing patient's readiness to name decision-maker, discuss care preferences, complete legal advance directive
Patient Quality of Life 3 months, 6 months, one year Measure (Promis 29) assessing quality of life, including domains of physical functional, emotional, and social well-being
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Emory University
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of South Carolina
🇺🇸Columbia, South Carolina, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States