Comparison of two different surgical operation techniques for lower jaw fractures
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: T888- Other specified complications of surgical and medical care, not elsewhere classified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/10/037566
- Lead Sponsor
- Dept of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
1. Participants in the age group of 18 â?? 60 years.
2. Participants with unilateral/bilateral condylar fractures indicated for open reduction.
3. Participants with unilateral/bilateral condylar fractures along with other concomitant fractures of mandible indicated for open reduction.
4. Participants who have sustained fracture in the past two weeks.
5. Subject willingness to participate in the study.
1. Participants with history of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, prolonged steroid therapy, compromised immunity and associated bone
pathology.
2. Intracapsular Condylar fracture.
3. Undisplaced fractures of Mandibular Condylar fracture.
4. Patients with high condylar fractures.
5. Patients who have undergone open reduction and internal fixation for condylar fractures previously.
6. Participants with tendency for keloid formation and those with contused lacerated wounds, abrasions or Avulsive soft tissue injuries around the area of extraoral incision. (pre existing scar)
7. Presence of preinjury Facial nerve palsy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method