Non-rebreather at Flush Rate Compared to Bag Valve Mask With Assist
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 27
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Fraction of expired oxygen
研究概览
简要总结
This crossover investigation enrolls healthy volunteers and compares the exhaled oxygen content (FeO2) between the non-rebreather mask at the flush rate and a bag-valve-mask device at the flush rate, used with active positive pressure assistance.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •Any facial hair more than stubble that might impede a mask seal
研究组 & 干预措施
Non-rebreather
This group will have a non-rebreather mask applied to the face and they will receive the flush rate oxygen intervention
干预措施: Flush rate oxygen (Other)
Bag-valve-mask
With each inspiration from the subject, the ventilation bag will be gently squeezed to provide positive pressure and augment the amount of oxygen that is received by the subject for each breath. This group will receive the flush rate oxygen with assist intervention.
干预措施: Flush rate oxygen with assist (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Fraction of expired oxygen
时间窗: 3 minutes
The fraction of expired oxygen will be measured after three minutes of preoxygenation
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Brian Driver
Associate Research Director
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute