Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Rectal Prolapse
- Interventions
- Device: Laparoscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT04117633
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:
- Detailed Description
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy Patient and Methods: The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar university hospitals, Cairo, Egypt . The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
Inclusion Criteria
Children with persistant complete Rectal Prolapse.
- Failure of conservative treatment.
- more than 2 attacks of prolapse requiring manual reduction.
Exclusion Criteria
- Sever constipation
- Previous abdominal or pelvic surgery with extensive adhesions.
- Cases older than 12ys,
- Patients with rectal polyp
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mesh Rectopexy Laparoscopy Using Laparoscopy Suture Rectopexy Laparoscopy Using Laparoscopy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Signs of improvement 12 weeks No recurrence of Rectal Prolapse
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Signs of improvement 30 weeks Improvement of Fecal Incontinence score(Rintala score)