Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children : A Comparative Randomized Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 64
- 主要终点
- Signs of improvement
研究概览
简要总结
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:
详细描述
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy Patient and Methods: The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar university hospitals, Cairo, Egypt . The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Care Provider)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 5 Years 至 12 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Children with persistant complete Rectal Prolapse.
- •Failure of conservative treatment.
- •more than 2 attacks of prolapse requiring manual reduction.
排除标准
- •Sever constipation
- •Previous abdominal or pelvic surgery with extensive adhesions.
- •Cases older than 12ys,
- •Patients with rectal polyp
研究组 & 干预措施
Mesh Rectopexy
Using Laparoscopy
干预措施: Laparoscopy (Device)
Suture Rectopexy
Using Laparoscopy
干预措施: Laparoscopy (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Signs of improvement
时间窗: 12 weeks
No recurrence of Rectal Prolapse
次要结局
- Signs of improvement(30 weeks)
研究者
abdelaziz yehya
professor
Al-Azhar University