Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Rectal Prolapse

• Registration Number: NCT04117633
• Lead Sponsor: Al-Azhar University

Brief Summary

Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:

Detailed Description

Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy Patient and Methods: The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar university hospitals, Cairo, Egypt . The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2010-02-01
• Primary Completion: 2015-01-15
• Study Completion: 2018-12-18
• Study First Submitted: 2019-09-28
• Status Verified: 2019-10
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-10-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2019-10-06
• Study First Posted: 2019-10-07
• Last Update Posted: 2019-10-08

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 64

Inclusion Criteria

Children with persistant complete Rectal Prolapse.

• Failure of conservative treatment.
• more than 2 attacks of prolapse requiring manual reduction.

Exclusion Criteria

• Sever constipation
• Previous abdominal or pelvic surgery with extensive adhesions.
• Cases older than 12ys,
• Patients with rectal polyp

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Signs of improvement	12 weeks	No recurrence of Rectal Prolapse

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Signs of improvement	30 weeks	Improvement of Fecal Incontinence score(Rintala score)