跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06565962
NCT06565962已完成不适用

'The Effect of Virtual Reality Use on Disaster Literacy, Disaster Readiness and Disaster Resilience in Adults Living in Rural Areas: A Randomised Controlled Study

FATOŞ UNCU2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 64 人开始时间: 2024年9月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
64
试验地点
2
主要终点
Disaster literacy scale

研究概览

简要总结

Pre-disaster mitigation and preparedness activities are essential to reduce vulnerability in a community and protect people when disasters occur. Although disaster preparedness and protective behaviours have attracted the attention of scholars worldwide, there is no significant study on the preparedness, disaster literacy and disaster resilience of rural households. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of virtual reality use on disaster literacy, disaster preparedness and individual disaster resilience in adults living in rural areas.

详细描述

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of natural disasters and the loss of life and property caused by disasters in the world and in Turkey. Turkey is a country where tectonic strata are commonly found. Besides, it has various natural disaster risks considering its geological features, topography and meteorological conditions. According to the statistics of the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) for 2022, the natural disaster events that occurred in 2022 were as follows: 18 avalanches, 21,054 earthquakes, 859 landslides, 137 rock falls, 13 sinkholes, 450 floods/floods and 451 others, totalling 22,982. Considering the high physical and social vulnerability of Turkey, these disasters cause a high number of deaths, injuries and material losses. The solution to minimise the negative impacts of disasters is to be prepared for future disasters. For this reason, there is a need for raising awareness of the society about disasters and disaster risk avoidance skills known as disaster literacy. Disaster literacy is defined as the degree to which individuals read, understand and use information to make informed decisions and follow instructions in the context of mitigation, preparation, response and recovery. In the last decade, virtual reality-based training in disaster preparedness has been increasingly recognised as an important and new alternative to the traditional methods of real-life drills and tabletop exercises. Many studies have described various applications of virtual reality in disaster training. In 2001, Freeman et al. published the use of a virtual reality patient simulation system to teach emergency response skills to US Navy medical personnel. In 2007, a virtual simulation-enhanced triage training for Iraqi medical personnel was described. The following year, immersive simulation for training first responders to mass casualty incidents,mass casualty triage skills using immersive three-dimensional virtual reality, and critical care skills during mass casualty drills. The equivalence of VR simulators with live actor-patient use in directing actions has been demonstrated and simulation for team training and assessment using virtual worlds. In 2009, game-based mass casualty burn training was proposed.In 2011, Cone et al. published a comparison of SALT and SMART triage systems using a virtual reality simulator with paramedic students. Finally, virtual simulation as a teaching method for nursing students has been shown to reinforce learning and improve retention of learning over time.

Pre-disaster mitigation and preparedness activities are essential to reduce vulnerability in a community and protect people when disasters occur. Although disaster preparedness and protective behaviours have attracted the attention of scholars worldwide, there is no significant study on the preparedness, disaster literacy and disaster resilience of rural households. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of virtual reality use on disaster literacy, disaster preparedness and individual disaster resilience in adults living in rural areas.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The research will be conducted in a randomised controlled experimental design. The participants randomly assigned to the groups will first be administered data collection forms as a pre-test. Then, the experimental group will be made to watch the training videos prepared by AFAD on disaster preparedness, disaster moment and post-disaster by using virtual reality goggles. Then, data collection for the post-test will be carried out from both groups. After a 3-month follow-up period, follow-up test questionnaires will be collected from both groups. No intervention will be made to the control group. Personal information form, disaster literacy scale, disaster preparedness scale and disaster resistance scale will be used to collect the research data.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Not having received structured disaster training before
  • Not having any mental problems that prevent them from completing the questionnaires

排除标准

  • Participants wants to leave the study
  • Incomplete filling of survey forms

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention group

Experimental

Participants randomly assigned to groups will first be given data collection forms as a pre-test. Then, the experimental group will be given an 8-week disaster risk reduction programme. They will watch PowerPoint presentations prepared by researchers and training videos prepared by AFAD on disaster preparedness, disaster response and post-disaster issues using virtual reality glasses. Subsequently, data collection for the post-test will be conducted for both groups. After a three-month follow-up period, follow-up test surveys will be collected from both groups.

干预措施: Educaiton group (Other)

active comparator group

Active Comparator

The control group will receive standard care. The standard care programme will include brochures and guidance. Personal information form, disaster literacy scale, disaster preparedness scale and disaster resistance scale will be used to collect the research data.

干预措施: control group (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Disaster literacy scale

时间窗: 3 month

It is a self-report scale developed by Çalışkan and Üner (2023) to evaluate AFOY in people aged 18-60 years. The scale consists of 61 items and four sub-dimensions: harm reduction, preparation, intervention and improvement. Likert-type scale is graded from 1=very difficult to 5=very easy. There are no reverse items in the scale. The total score that can be obtained from the scale is between 61-305. The high score obtained from the scale shows that the disaster literacy level of individuals is high. In the scale, 0 indicates the lowest AFOY and 50 indicates the highest AFOY. The scale is divided into criteria as 0-\<30 points inadequate AFOY, 30-\<36 points limited AFOY, 36-\<42 points adequate AFOY and 42-50 points excellent AFOY: Scores= (0-\<30): inadequate AFOY; (30-\<36): limited AFOY; (36-\<42): adequate AFOY; (42-50): excellent AFOY. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency of the whole scale is α=0.954.

Disaster literacy scale

时间窗: 3 month

It is a self-report scale developed by Çalışkan and Üner (2023) to evaluate AFOY in people aged 18-60 years. The scale consists of 61 items and four sub-dimensions: harm reduction, preparation, intervention and improvement. Likert-type scale is graded from 1=very difficult to 5=very easy. There are no reverse items in the scale. The total score that can be obtained from the scale is between 61-305. The high score obtained from the scale shows that the disaster literacy level of individuals is high. In the scale, 0 indicates the lowest AFOY and 50 indicates the highest AFOY. The scale is divided into criteria as 0-\<30 points inadequate AFOY, 30-\<36 points limited AFOY, 36-\<42 points adequate AFOY and 42-50 points excellent AFOY: Scores= (0-\<30): inadequate AFOY; (30-\<36): limited AFOY; (36-\<42): adequate AFOY; (42-50): excellent AFOY. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency of the whole scale is α=0.954.

次要结局

  • Disaster preparedness scale(baseline (pre test), post test (8 week) and after 3 month)
  • Individual Disaster Resilience Scale(baseline (pre test), post test (8 week) and after 3 month)

研究者

发起方
FATOŞ UNCU
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

FATOŞ UNCU

assistant professor

Firat University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验