Ultrasound-guided Axillary Vein Access Versus Cephalic Venous Cutdown for Implantation of Cardiac Electronic Devices.
- Conditions
- Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillatorPacemaker
- Interventions
- Device: Ultrasound-guided axillary vein accessDevice: Cephalic vein access
- Registration Number
- NCT04649788
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Brief Summary
Venous access is a fundamental step in lead insertion for endovenous cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Cephalic vein cutdown is the most widely used technique in Europe. Ultrasound-guided axillary vein access is a promising alternative but there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting this technique.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided axillary vein access versus cephalic venous cutdown for implantation of endovenous CIED.
Half of patients is implanted using an ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture. The other half is implanted using a cephalic vein cutdown. After venous access is achieved, implantation procedure is identical in the two arms.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- 18 years or older
- Indication for endovenous pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator (single or double room)
- History of previously implanted endocardial lead
- Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Impossibility of venous access
- Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Participating in another clinical study which can interfere with this study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ultrasound-guided axillary vein access Ultrasound-guided axillary vein access This group of patients will receive the cardiac implantable electronic device with ultrasound-guided axillary venous access. Cephalic vein access Cephalic vein access This group of patients will receive the cardiac implantable electronic device with cephalic venous access.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Success of venous access Intervention time (day 0) This outcome is measured by the operator during the intervention. It is the ability to successfully cannulate the vein and have all needed guidewire in the right atrium using the assigned venous access technique.
The outcome is a binary value: success or failure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method X-Ray exposure Intervention time (day 0) X-ray exposure during intervention, measured in mGycm2
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) related infection Month 3 Local and systemic signs of CIED related infection will be monitored during follow-up. The definition and classification of CIED related infection are based on the current guideline and expert consensus statement.
Procedure duration Intervention time (day 0) Time from cutaneous incision to skin suture
Fluoroscopy time Intervention time (day 0) Duration of fluoroscopy use during intervention
Time to venous access Intervention time (day 0) Time from cutaneous incision to reach the right atrium with all needed guidewire using the assigned venous access technique
Complication Intervention time (day 0) All implant related complications including brachial plexus palsy, major pocket hematoma (hematoma requiring evacuation or transfusion or prolonged hospitalization), pneumothorax, hemothorax, pericardial effusion, lead dislodgement, device infection, venous thrombosis.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital de la Croix Rousse
🇫🇷Lyon, France