MedPath

Resources for Optimizing Outcomes in Toddlers on the Spectrum

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Registration Number
NCT07086781
Lead Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess whether telehealth-based Family Navigation (FN) expedites enrollment (e.g., reduces time in days) in community-based autism intervention for toddlers under the age of 4 living in Rural NC after their initial diagnosis of autism.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does Family Navigation decrease the time to initiation of intervention for rural toddlers with autism?

Does Family Navigation improve developmental outcomes at 18 months post-diagnosis of autism?

Does Family Navigation improve caregiver well-being?

Caregivers in the Family Navigation condition will receive 4 research-based individual sessions with a trained navigator to support them in identifying and enrolling in recommended autism early intervention services. All navigation sessions will be delivered virtually via phone/Zoom.

Researchers will compare participants who receive family navigation to participants who receive the standard of care (educational materials) to see if family navigation outperforms the standard of care.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Children up to 48 months who have a new diagnosis of autism (within the last month) or who are waiting for a diagnosis of autism AND their caregiver.
  • Live in North Carolina, in one of the 78 rural counties.
  • Caregiver must be over the age of 18
  • The caregiver must speak conversationally fluent English.
Exclusion Criteria
  • No access to a telephone or internet connection for phone calls or video conferencing.
  • Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is ruled out in the child.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to initiation of autism specific interventionDiagnosis to 18 months post

The date of initiation (date 1) of autism-specific intervention will be the date that families report the first session with a therapist following the diagnosis (date 2). Time will be calculated as the number of days elapsed between these two dates (date 2 - date 1).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Caregiver Well-Being Score6 months post diagnosis

Scores on the General Well-Being Schedule will be used to measure caregiver well-being. Total scores range from 0-110. Higher scores are indicative of more positive well-being. There are 3 proposed scoring cut-points: 0-60 reflects "severe distress", 61-72 reflects "moderate distress", and 73-110 reflects "positive well-being). The investigators will compare means and standard deviations between groups.

Change in Raw Scores on Visual Reception domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosis

This outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Visual Reception domain. Raw scores will ne used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains.

Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability.

Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Visual Reception domain range from 0-50.

Change in Raw Scores on Expressive Language domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosis

This outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Expressive Language domain. Raw scores will be used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains.

Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability.

Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Expressive Language domain range from 0 - 50.

Change in Raw Scores on Receptive Language domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosis

This outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Receptive Language domain. Raw scores will be used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains.

Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability.

Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Receptive Language domain range from 0 - 48.

Change in Raw Scores on Fine Motor domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosis

This outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Fine Motor domain. Raw scores will be used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains.

Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability.

Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Visual Reception domain range from 0 - 49.

Change in Raw Scores on ABAS-3 Conceptual, Social and Practical DomainsBaseline and 18 months post diagnosis

This outcome will assess change in raw scores for each of the three adaptive domains (Conceptual, Social and Practical) from the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Third Edition (ABAS-3). Raw scores offer greater sensitivity for detecting within-subject developmental changes over time. Each domain will be analyzed separately as a continuous variable. Where applicable, domain raw scores will also be summed to provide an exploratory composite.

Higher scores indicate greater adaptive skill development.

Conceptual domain raw score range: 0-222 Social domain raw score range: 0 - 144 Practical domain raw score range: 0-279

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities

🇺🇸

Carrboro, North Carolina, United States

Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities
🇺🇸Carrboro, North Carolina, United States
Kelly Caravella, PhD
Contact
2035244349
kelly_caravella@med.unc.edu

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.