Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06473870
NCT06473870
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Understanding Lung Cancer Related Risk Factors and Their Impact

Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute5 sites in 3 countries6,160 target enrollmentJuly 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Lung Cancer Screening
Sponsor
Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute
Enrollment
6160
Locations
5
Primary Endpoint
presence of pulmonary nodules
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

LUCIA aims to develop prediction models for the early diagnosis of lung cancer based on the identification of risk factors and deeper cellular knowledge, by recording real-world data; with risk assessment tools, non-invasive devices and omics analysis. These models will enable new clinical pathways and diagnostic workflow to be implemented to ensure early diagnosis and confirmation, including classification of lung cancer subtype.

Detailed Description

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, causing more deaths than breast and prostate cancer combined. The current five-year survival rate after diagnosis of all types of lung cancer in Europe is 13% (11.2% for men and 13.9% for women). The five-year survival rate for some types of lung cancer ranges from 6% to 7% (small cell LC) and 23% to 28% for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently there are important deficiencies when it comes to achieving an adequate lung cancer screening program. According to principles established in 1968, a screening program should be based on pathology that can be improved through the use of population screening. The evidence suggests two important gaps in early detection. On the one hand, the identification of risk factors beyond smoking and age. And on the other hand, the only tool for early detection that has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in lung cancer is chest CT, a test that may not be sustainable in the long term for many healthcare systems. In parallel, lung cancer diagnoses among never smokers and reduced smokers are increasing rapidly, suggesting that if lung cancer screening research continues focusing only on the heaviest smokers, a gap will persist between the population that performs the test and the population that suffers from the disease. Evidence also suggests that people undergoing screening are not being optimally referred for follow-up or kept engaged in long-term screening. Currently there are important deficiencies when it comes to achieving an adequate lung cancer screening program. The incidence in individuals without a history of smoking is increasingly higher. Therefore, an observational, longitudinal, multicenter cohort analytical study will be conducted to determine eligibility for screening based on individualized risk (based on age, a more detailed smoking history, occupational exposure, and other risk factors such as ethnicity and family history of lung cancer) and the development and validation of lung cancer risk predictive models that can improve screening efficiency and reduce lung cancer morbidity and mortality. These models will allow new clinical pathways and diagnostic workflow to be implemented to ensure rapid diagnosis and confirmation, including lung cancer subtype classification. The study consists of collecting data from participants in 4 visits over two years. During each visit, the clinical evaluation will be carried out, which will consist of the collection of sociodemographic data and clinical history, physical examination, concomitant medication, collection of exposure data and guide symptoms, Quality of Life questionnaires and geolocation. In addition, the following tests will be performed: low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), blood tests, genomic analysis and tests with new non-invasive devices (spectrometry on card (SPOC), breath analyzer (BAN) and broad-spectrum biomarker sensor patch (WBSP)). With all this, the aim is to develop and validate new tests based on new non-invasive and easy-to-use technologies that allow for the implementation of more efficient, acceptable and equitable population screening programs in the near future. The completion of this project will allow to provide data that can be used to better understand and discover new risk factors for suffering from lung cancer and therefore improve the management of the disease. Furthermore, this study will favor the reduction of long-term morbidity and mortality from lung cancer and will allow the future implementation of a lung cancer program.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2024
End Date
December 2027
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects under 40 years of age
  • Unable to be followed-up for at least 2-years or complete the study
  • Subjects that do not sign the informed consent
  • Current or prior history of lung cancer
  • History of neoplasia in the previous 5 years except non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Moderate-severe comorbidities that prevent completion of a diagnostic study in the event of findings suggestive of lung neoplasia (by means of the investigator's clinical judgment) or surgical intervention (\< 6 months) if not previously confirmed by cytohistology.
  • Vulnerable subjects: severe psychiatric comorbidity, adults under guardianship or deprived of liberty
  • Pregnant women

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

presence of pulmonary nodules

Time Frame: 2 years

The main variable is the presence of pulmonary nodules identified by Low Dose Computerized Tomography (LDCT)

Lung Cancer diagnosis

Time Frame: 2 years

The main variable is the presence of Lung Cancer diagnosis identified by Low Dose Computerized Tomography (LDCT).

Secondary Outcomes

  • heart rate(2 years)
  • respiratory rate(2 years)
  • Socioeconomic factors(2 years)
  • weight(2 years)
  • Wide-biomarker-spectrum Multi-Use Sensing Patch (WBSP)(2 years)
  • Spectrometry-on-Card (SPOC)(2 years)
  • Iron(baseline)
  • Chloride(baseline)
  • height(2 years)
  • Body Mass Index(2 years)
  • Medical record(2 years)
  • Exposure to harmful agents(2 years)
  • Age(2 years)
  • Gender(2 years)
  • Education level(2 years)
  • Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)(2 years)
  • FEV1/FVC ratio(2 years)
  • Transferrin Index(baseline)
  • transferrin(baseline)
  • Alkaline phosphatase(baseline)
  • Sodium(baseline)
  • partial thromboplastin time(baseline)
  • international normalized ratio (INR)(baseline)
  • HEALTH-PROMOTING LIFESTYLE PROFILE II questionnaire (HPLP II)(2 years)
  • Fantastic lifestyle Checklist(2 years)
  • The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire(2 years)
  • Glucose(baseline)
  • HDL Cholesterol(baseline)
  • Proteins(baseline)
  • GOT(baseline)
  • potassium(baseline)
  • carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)(baseline)
  • Neuronal specific enolase (NSE)(baseline)
  • Breath Analyzer (BAN) device(2 years)
  • Ethnicity(2 years)
  • Blood pressure(2 years)
  • Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification(2 years)
  • Exploratory Omics markers(baseline)
  • Mediterranean diet adherence questionnaire(2 years)
  • EuroQoL-5D-5L questionnaire(2 years)
  • Lung CT scan description(2 years)
  • Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)(2 years)
  • Tumor pathology(2 years)
  • C reactive protein(baseline)
  • Albumin(baseline)
  • LDL Cholesterol(baseline)
  • Lactate dehydrogenase(baseline)
  • phosphate(baseline)
  • urea(baseline)
  • erythrocyte sedimentation rate(baseline)
  • Ferritin(baseline)
  • Triglycerides(baseline)
  • GPT(baseline)
  • GGT(baseline)
  • Creatinine(baseline)
  • CA 125(baseline)
  • CYFRA 21.1(baseline)
  • Complete blood count(baseline)
  • fibrinogen(baseline)
  • prothrombin time(baseline)
  • Geo location(2 years)
  • Cholesterol(baseline)
  • calcium(baseline)
  • Bilirubin(baseline)
  • Urate(baseline)

Study Sites (5)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials