Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03423303
NCT03423303Enrolling By InvitationNot Applicable

Randomized Population-Based Pragmatic Prostate Cancer Screening Trial Based on PSA, Kallikrein Panel, and MRI

Tampere University2 sites in 1 country17,400 target enrollmentStarted: April 23, 2018Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Enrollment
17,400
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Prostate cancer (PrCa) mortality

Study Overview

Brief Summary

A population-based randomised trial of prostate cancer screening will be carried out. A total of approximately 117,200 men aged 50-63 in Helsinki and Tampere are randomised to intervention (screening) or control arm. A reduction in harms of screening in the form of overdiagnosis is sought, while retaining as much as possible of the mortality benefit (reduction in prostate cancer mortality). Novel methods that have been shown to increase specificity for clinically relevant prostate cancer but never tested in a randomised setting will be employed in screening and diagnostics. The main end-point is prostate cancer mortality at 10 and 15 years of follow-up.

Detailed Description

Frequent adverse effects have so far tipped the balance of benefits and harms against prostate cancer screening, and therefore the investigators will focus on employing the best possible means for reducing them. The project introduces a novel concept for PC screening that minimises overdiagnosis and overtreatment, while retaining the mortality benefit to shift the balance of screening benefits and harms to a favourable net effect. The strategy for implementation as a randomised screening trial utilises three levels of risk assessment (PSA, kallikrein panel and MRI) before the diagnostic procedure (prostate biopsy), each aimed at eliminating detection of indolent disease. The study hypothesis is that by virtue of the novel three-tiered screening algorithm, the beneficial screening effect (prostate cancer mortality reduction) can be retained, while the overdiagnosis can be largely eliminated. The impact of an integrative approach has never been evaluated - each of the methods has only been assessed in isolation. The breakthrough potential of the proposal lies in combining the three novel approaches and taking them to the forefront of applied research through a randomised trial. The key impact of the study is in defining whether the overall balance of benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening can be reversed by applying the best possible methods to detect only clinically important disease. If the study hypothesis is affirmed, it opens the way to introduction of prostate cancer screening. If the balance of harms and benefits is still unfavourable, the problem of overdiagnosis in prostate cancer may be intractable.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Screening
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
50 Years to 63 Years (Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • 50-63-year-old men (age in 2018) residing in Tampere or Helsinki

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prevalent prostate cancer

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Prostate cancer (PrCa) mortality

Time Frame: At 10 years of follow-up.

An intention to screen analysis will be performed, with all men in the groups defined by random allocation, regardless of compliance. Follow-up starts at randomisation, and ends at death. Cox regression will be used with prostate cancer death as the outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Prostate cancer (PrCa) mortality - secondary analysis(At 10 years of follow-up.)
  • Cumulative incidence of advanced (T3-T4 or M1) prostate cancer(At approximately 5 years of follow-up.)
  • Cumulative incidence of low-risk cancer (Gleason<7)(At approximately 5 years of follow-up.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Anssi Auvinen

Professor

Tampere University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials