Effects of Interpersonal Relational Role Analysis on Nursing Students' Depressive Symptoms and Coping Styles
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 385
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Beck Depression Inventory
研究概览
简要总结
Introduction: Interpersonal Relational Role Analysis (IRRA) is a psychosocial group intervention that allows individuals to see the problems they experience in interpersonal relationships and interactions in the group environment and to be handled together with group members.
Aim: The present study aims to investigate the effects of IRRA on nursing students' depressive symptoms and coping styles.
Method: This study was conducted with randomized controlled, pre-test-post-test control group design and follow-up test patterns. Students with depressive symptoms were randomly assigned to control (n=10) or intervention groups (n=10). Intervention group students received 21 weeks of IRRA intervention.
Results: It was determined that IRRA had a positive effect on nursing students' depressive symptoms and coping styles.
Discussion: This study is the first to evaluate the effects of IRRA on depressive symptoms and coping styles. Our study provides evidence on the effectiveness of IRRA in reducing the depressive symptoms of nursing students and in managing stress.
Implications for Practice: IRRA is a practical and useful intervention that mental health nurses can incorporate and use in their clinical practice while helping individuals to become aware of problems in relationships and roles that may impair their mental health.
详细描述
Aim and Design Aiming to investigate the effects of Interpersonal Relational Role Analysis (IRRA) on nursing students' depressive symptoms and coping styles, this study was conducted with randomized controlled, pre-test-post-test control group design and follow-up test patterns.
Research population and sample The study was conducted in the 2018-2019 academic year (November 2018 - April 2019). The research population comprised second-year nursing students studying at two different state universities in the 2018-2019 academic year (n=385). Since the researcher had an instructional relationship with the first-, third-, and fourth-year students, the study was performed with the second-year students. The number of people to be included in the groups was calculated in the G*Power (3.1.9.2) package program based on a research. As a result of the power analysis with an effect size of 0.7, a power of 80%, and an alpha level (probability of making a type I error) of 0.05, the sample size was calculated as a total of 16 students (8 in the intervention and 8 in the control group). Considering the possibility of drop-outs during the study, the research was conducted with a total of 20 students (10 in the intervention and 10 in the control group). Effective implementation of IRRA requires interaction among the group members; therefore, the intervention group was composed of students studying in the same class. To prevent interaction between the control group and the intervention group, the control group was composed of students studying at a different state university in the same city with the same education program. The students who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study were assigned to the intervention and control groups with the Research Randomizer program. Randomization was performed by a researcher who was not included in the research. To make the study a single-blind study, students were not informed about the group to which they were assigned.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) being a nursing student at the university during the research (November 2018-April 2019), (b) not having any disability that would cause difficulties in filling in the data collection tools or during sessions, (c) scoring scores indicating mild to moderate depression from the Beck Depression Inventory, (d) agreeing to participate in the research, and (e) being over 18 years old. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) scoring scores indicating severe depression from the Beck Depression Inventory (severe depression requires psychopharmacological treatment).
Data Collection Tools Sociodemographic Characteristics Form This form, developed by the researchers, contains questions about students' sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, marital status, economic status, and parental educational status.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) The inventory consists of 21 self-report items that allow evaluating the severity of depressive symptoms rather than the diagnosis of depression. The total score obtained from the scale is evaluated, each item is scored between 0 and 3, and there are no reverse-scored items on the scale. 0-9 points indicate probably no depression, 10-16 points mild depression levels, 17-24 points moderate depression levels, and 25 and above points severe depression. The above-mentioned classification was used in this study. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.74.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •being a nursing student at the university during the research (November 2018-April 2019),
- •not having any disability that would cause difficulties in filling in the data collection tools or during sessions,
- •scoring scores indicating mild to moderate depression from the Beck Depression Inventory,
- •agreeing to participate in the research,
- •being over 18 years old.
排除标准
- •scoring scores indicating severe depression from the Beck Depression Inventory (severe depression requires psychopharmacological treatment).
研究组 & 干预措施
Control Group
The students in the control group were informed about the research, informed consents were obtained from them, and pre-tests (Beck Depression Inventory, Coping Styles Inventory) were applied to them. No intervention was applied to the control group (n=10). Once the Interpersonal Relational Role Analysis sessions were completed, post-tests (Beck Depression Inventory, Coping Styles Inventory) were applied to the control group. Three months later, a follow-up test (Beck Depression Inventory, Coping Styles Inventory) was applied to control groups. After the follow-up test, the participants in the control group were referred to the psychological support unit of the university.
Intervention Group
The Beck Depression Inventory[BDI] (inclusion criteria) was applied face to face to the students who constituted the population (n=385). After the BDI scores were evaluated, the students who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups.
In a preliminary interview held with the intervention group (n=10), they were informed about the subject of the research, the duration and content of the implementation process, session rules, and that sessions would be audio-recorded. Informed consent forms were obtained from them, and pre-tests (BDI, Coping Styles Inventory[CSI]) were applied.
A total of 21 90-minute Interpersonal Relational Role Analysis (IRRA) sessions (two sessions a week) were held with the intervention group.
21 sessions of IRRA were applied to the intervention group, once the sessions were completed, post-tests (BDI, CSI) were applied. Three months later, a follow-up test (BDI, CSI) was applied to intervention group.
干预措施: Interpersonal Relational Role Analysis (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Beck Depression Inventory
时间窗: 5 months
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the inventory, which was developed by Beck et al. (1961), was conducted by Hisli (1989). The inventory consists of 21 self-report items that allow evaluating the severity of depressive symptoms rather than the diagnosis of depression. The total score obtained from the scale is evaluated, each item is scored between 0 and 3, and there are no reverse-scored items on the scale. 0-9 points indicate probably no depression, 10-16 points mild depression levels, 17-24 points moderate depression levels, and 25 and above points severe depression. The above-mentioned classification was used in this study. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.74 (Hisli, 1989).
次要结局
- Coping Styles Inventory(5 months)
研究者
Yasemin Cekic
Research Assistant Dr.
Ankara University
