Traditional Three-incision Esophagectomy Versus Minimally Invasive Thorascopic/Laparoscopic Esophagectomy for cT1b-3N0-1M0 Thoracic Esophageal Cancer
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 1,000
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Long term survival
研究概览
简要总结
Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Surgical resection remains the most effective method for this malignant disease. VATS esophagectomy has become more and more popular in China and around the world. Although VATS esophagectomy has been proven to be effective in preventing respiratory complications, there is still no ample evidences to demonstrate that VATS esophagectomy is as effective as traditional three-incision esophagectomy in lymph node dissection and is equal or superior in long-term survival. The purpose of this large scale prospective observational study is to compare the minimally invasive thorascopic/laparoscopic esophagectomy with traditional three-incision esophagectomy in lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, and long-term survival.
详细描述
Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis,For these patients, radical esophagectomy is the cornerstone of multimodality treatment with curative intent. Transthoracic esophagectomy is the preferred surgical approach worldwide allowing for en-bloc resection of the tumor. However, the percentage of cardiopulmonary complications associated with the traditional three-incision esophagectomy is high.Recent studies have shown that the minimally invasive thorascopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy is at least equivalent to the open transthoracic approach for esophageal cancer in terms of short-term oncological outcomes,including reduced blood loss, shorter ICU stay,and lower pulmonary complication rate, but the evidence is not ample because the sample size is not enough.The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, perioperative complications, lymph node dissection and long term survival between the thoracic esophageal cancer patients treated by minimally invasive thorascopic/laparoscopic esophagectomy and open transthoracic esophagectomy by three incisions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 75 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with histologically proven squamous cell esophageal cancer, without any previous anti-tumor therapy;
- •Preoperative clinical TNM stage:cT1b-3N0-1M0;
- •Adequate cardiopulmonary, liver, brain and kidney function which can tolerate the esophagectomy either via traditional tree-incision or minimally invasive thorascopic/laparoscopic esophagectomy;
- •Preoperative assessment by CT and EUS is fit for minimally invasive thorascopic/laparoscopic esophagectomy;
- •Willing to participate the clinical trial and sign the informed consent before being enrolled into clinical trail.
排除标准
- •Previous use of anti-cancer therapy;
- •Preoperative clinical TNM stage: N2-3 or M1;
- •Inadequate cardiopulmonary,liver, brain and kidney function for surgery;
- •Previous malignancy history;
- •Unwilling to participate the clinical trial and refuse to sign informed consent.
结局指标
主要结局
Long term survival
时间窗: 5 years
次要结局
- Postoperative complications(3 years)
- Disease free survival(5 years)
研究者
Jie He
President
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences