MedPath

Study in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Hay Fever
Interventions
Drug: Placebo Nasal Aerosol
Registration Number
NCT01024608
Lead Sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of an investigational nasal aerosol compared with placebo nasal aerosol in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
340
Inclusion Criteria
  • Informed Consent
  • Male or female subjects 12 years of age or older
  • Documented history of season allergic rhinitis to mountain cedar pollen
  • General good health
  • Other criteria apply
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of physical findings of nasal pathology (within 60 days prior to screening visit)
  • Participation in any investigational drug study 30 days preceding screening visit
  • History of respiratory infection/disorder with 14 days preceding screening visit
  • Use of any prohibited concomitant medications
  • Other criteria apply

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboPlacebo Nasal AerosolDuring the 2-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered four actuations (two per nostril) of placebo HFA once daily each morning.
BDP HFA 320 µg/dayBeclomethasone dipropionateDuring the 2-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered 4 actuations (two per nostril) of 80 µg BDP HFA once daily each morning.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Reported AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Days -3 to 0), and Days 1-15

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, nasal itching and nasal congestion) over the past 12 hours (prior to the assessment) twice daily (AM and PM) using the following scale:

0=absent (no sign/symptom present); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities and/or sleeping).

The rTNSS (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Reported AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Days -3 to 0), and Days 1-15

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, nasal itching and nasal congestion) over the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) twice daily (AM and PM) using the following scale:

0=absent (no sign/symptom present); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities).

The iTNSS (sum of the 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Change From Baseline at Week 2 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at BaselineDay 0 (Baseline), Day 15

The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains. Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Not Troubled to 6 = Extremely Troubled) for the domains of activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, and eye symptoms. The domain of 'emotional' utilized a separate scale (0 = None of the time to 6 = All of the time). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses. Week 2 scores were compared to baseline scores. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Subject-reported Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Days -3 to 0), and Days 1-15

Participants recorded the severity of their ocular symptoms (Itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes) over the past 12 hours (prior to the assessment) twice daily (AM and PM) using the following scale:

0=absent (no sign/symptom present); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities).

The total ocular symptom score ranges from 0 to 9 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Teva Clinical Trial Site

🇺🇸

Waco, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath