跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2020/05/025284
CTRI/2020/05/025284尚未招募不适用

ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUNCT IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK FOR PAEDIATRIC UPPER LIMB SURGERIES : A RANDOMISED DOUBLE BLIND CONTROLLED STUDY

Chacha Nehru bal Chikitsalaya Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2020年5月21日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Time to first analgesic request in postoperative period

研究概览

简要总结

STUDY TITLE: “Analgesic efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in Ultrasound guided Supraclavicular block for Paediatric Upper Limb Surgeries : a randomised double blind controlled studyâ€

INTRODUCTION: Upper limb surgeries have been performed safely in supraclavicular block for decades as a sole anaesthetic technique or in combination with sedation and general anaesthesia. The use of  ultrasound has improved the success rate of the block with excellent visualisation of the structures. In paediatric population, dexmedetomidine has undoubtedly improved the quality of post operative analgesia in various studies in  peripheral nerve blocks and caudal epidurals. An extensive search of literature revealed no study with regards to the use of dexmedetomidine in supraclavicular block in paediatric patients. Hence the present study is being planned to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular block in paediatric patients undergoing upper limb surgeries.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine  in ultrasound guided supraclavicular nerve block in paediatric upper limb surgeries.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE -

To compare the duration of analgesia in patients receiving general anaesthesia (GA) and supraclavicular block with dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine vs those receiving GA and supraclavicular block with bupivacaine only for paediatric upper limb surgeries.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES -

1.To compare the consumption of intraoperative opioids and post operative analgesics  in    the two groups.

2.To compare the incidence of any complications related to the anaesthetic techniques in the two groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Study Design: Hospital-based, prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study

Study Period: May 22nd 2020 to December 2020

Place of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, New Delhi

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children aged 3-12 years

  2. Undergoing elective upper limb surgeries

  3. ASA  physical status grade I and II

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contraindications for supraclavicular block (infection at the injection site,

history of bleeding disorders, patients on anticoagulants, history of drug allergy).

  1. Patients undergoing bilateral surgery on upper limbs in the same setting.

  2. Patients taking chronic analgesics.

 Methodology**:** 50 patients will be allocated in two groups of 25 each.

Group A patients will receive ultrasound guided supraclavicular block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.3 ml/kg with 0.5 ml normal saline.

 Group B patients will receive ultrasound guided supraclavicular block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.3 ml/kg + 1 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine in a volume of 0.5 ml.

We will compare the two groups in terms of time to first analgesic request, pain scores and the total consumption of analgesics  in the postoperative period for 24 hours.

Outcomes Measures:

PRIMARY OUTCOME :

Time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period

SECONDARY OUTCOMES :

  1. Total consumption of analgesics in postoperative period for 24 hours

  2. Intraoperative opioid consumption

  3. Pain scores in the postoperative period for 24 hours

  4. Satisfaction score for pain relief

  5. Untoward effects if any - hypotension , bradycardia, sedation, vomiting, pneumothorax

 Statistical Tests: Statistical analysis will be performed by the SPSS program for Windows, version 17.0(SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Normally distributed continuous variables will be compared using the unpaired t test, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test will be used for those variables that will not be normally distributed. Categorical variables will be analysed using either the chi square test. P<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Permuted block randomization, variable
盲法
Double Blind Double Dummy

入排标准

年龄范围
3.00 Year(s) 至 12.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Children aged 3-12 years
  • Undergoing elective upper limb surgeries
  • ASA physical status grade I and II.

排除标准

  • Any contraindications for supraclavicular block (infection at the injection site,history of bleeding disorders, patients on anticoagulants, history of drug allergy).
  • Patients undergoing bilateral surgery on upper limbs in the same setting.
  • Patients taking chronic analgesics.

结局指标

主要结局

Time to first analgesic request in postoperative period

时间窗: First 24 hours in postoperative period

次要结局

  • Intraoperative opioid consumption(Total duration of anaesthesia)
  • Total consumption of analgesics in postoperative period for 24 hours(30 mins,1 hr, 1.5 hr, 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 24 hrs)
  • Pain scores in the postoperative period for 24 hours(30 mins,1 hr, 1.5 hr, 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 24 hrs)
  • Satisfaction score for pain relief(at the end of 24 hrs)
  • Untoward effects if any - hypotension , bradycardia, sedation, vomiting, pneumothorax

研究者

发起方
Chacha Nehru bal Chikitsalaya Hospital
申办方类型
Government funding agency

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验