Offering Women PrEP With Education and Shared Decision-making
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission
- Sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Enrollment
- 189
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- PrEP Prescriptions (As Measured by Chart Review)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
To address the significant barriers to PrEP implementation for those who were assigned female at birth and self-identify as a woman and address racial inequities in HIV prevention in the United States (US), a novel approach that accounts for multilevel influences is necessary. This study is one part of a multi-component project and involves a patient-level intervention in one public health family planning clinic in Duval County Florida, where the majority of patients are women of color. The area has one of the highest HIV incidence rates among women in the US. The investigators developed a tablet-based decision support tool that helps users learn about HIV vulnerabilities and HIV prevention strategies to inform how they consider options for reducing their likelihood of acquiring HIV. Participants will be randomized to use the HIV decision support tool before their visit or standard counseling (without the use of the tool) and will be surveyed about the use of the tool, experiences with HIV prevention counseling, and intentions about the use of HIV prevention. A subset of participants, all individuals who self-identify as a woman and as Black or Latina, will also complete a post-clinic visit interview. The investigators will follow-up with participants at three months following their initial visit to see if they have initiated the HIV prevention method(s) they chose at their visit. The main outcomes will include a quantitative and qualitative assessment of PrEP or other HIV prevention use, decisional certainty, and satisfaction with information about HIV prevention options.
Hypotheses:
- Women who use the HIV prevention decision support tool will be more likely to have initiated PrEP within 3 months compared to women who received standard counseling at the time of their initial appointment.
- The HIV prevention decision support tool will increase women's knowledge of PrEP and other HIV prevention methods compared to women who received standard counseling at the time of their initial appointment.
- The HIV prevention decision support tool will increase participants' decisional certainty in their choice of an HIV prevention method compared to women who received standard counseling at the time of their initial appointment.
Detailed Description
Although 13% of the U.S. female population is Black, 60% of new HIV diagnoses in U.S. women occur among Black women. The South is the epicenter of the U.S. HIV epidemic, including in women, and Black Southern women are disproportionately affected: Black women account for 69% of new HIV diagnoses in women in the South. As the first highly effective, discrete, woman-controlled HIV prevention method, oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine radically expands HIV prevention options for women. However, uptake of PrEP in U.S. women has lagged, particularly among groups most affected by HIV. PrEP cascades outline the necessary steps for accessing PrEP, including screening and identifying eligible individuals, linkage to care, prescription, and initiation of PrEP. Data suggest there are multilevel barriers related to the process of screening for HIV risk in women and identifying potential PrEP candidates that may drive a significant drop off early in the PrEP cascade for women. Women report feeling judged by risk assessment questions and experience stigma around disclosing sexual practices. As a result, if screening is required to educate patients about PrEP - as is true in most clinical settings - many women for whom PrEP is appropriate may never learn about PrEP. Further, women have low levels of knowledge about HIV risk and HIV prevention options, and therefore will not seek out PrEP services themselves. By offering education to all women about vulnerabilities to HIV as well as information about HIV prevention methods including PrEP, at-risk women can circumvent these multifactorial barriers and request PrEP. Electronic decision support tools (DST), which have been used with success in a range of healthcare contexts including contraception, provide an efficient and private mechanism for this information-sharing step. The study team developed a tablet-based tool that is designed to provide universal PrEP education and facilitate women's agency to identify their own risks and interest in PrEP. It was refined with iterative feedback from patient and community stakeholders and finalized based on cognitive testing. The DST provides information about vulnerabilities to HIV and core characteristics of different HIV prevention methods, and then the opportunity to explore these characteristics in depth, including efficacy, safety and side effects. The user chooses the level of information that they wish to receive through the interactive interface, allowing for an individualized experience. Upon reaching the end of the tool, information on the tablet suggests that women ask their provider about HIV prevention methods they are interested in using, based on their preferences for method characteristics, and their questions in order to facilitate deliberation with the provider. The DST takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Approximately 200 women presenting to one reproductive health clinic in Duval County, Florida, will be randomized to standard counseling plus use of an HIV prevention DST, providing education about PrEP and encouraging self-assessment of HIV risk, or standard counseling alone. In addition to the experimental intervention, a subset of 40 participants (20 per arm) will be asked to allow audio-recording of their counseling sessions with a provider. A subset of up to 40 additional participants (20 per arm), all of whom self-identify as women of color, will be invited to complete one-hour, semi-structured interviews after their clinic visit about their experiences of using the DST, HIV prevention counseling, and decision making about PrEP.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Self-identify as a woman (regardless of pregnancy status)
- •Age 18 - 45 years
- •Not known to be living with HIV (based on self-report)
- •English-speaking
- •Interested in participating
Exclusion Criteria
- •Unable to consent
- •Currently using PrEP
- •Those who were assigned male at birth and self-identify as a man
- •Unwilling to be contacted in 3 months
- •Already participated in the study
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
PrEP Prescriptions (As Measured by Chart Review)
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline visit
The number of participants who received a PrEP prescription within 3 months of their baseline visit, obtained by chart extraction from the medical record. Outcome is dichotomous (Yes, received a PrEP prescription /No, did not receive a PrEP prescription).
Secondary Outcomes
- Decisional Conflict - Total Score(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Patient-Perceived HIV Risk(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Decisional Conflict - Support Subscore(Immediately post baseline visit)
- HIV Prevention Method Continuation(3 months post baseline visit)
- Decisional Conflict - Effective Decision Subscore(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Interpersonal Quality of HIV Prevention Care(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Perceived Quality of Information Received About HIV Prevention(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Perception of the Decision Support Tool(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Satisfaction With the Decision Support Tool(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Number of Patients Reporting PrEP Use(3 months post baseline visit)
- Change in Patient-Perceived HIV Risk(Baseline, pre-intervention compared to immediately post baseline visit)
- PrEP Knowledge(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Acceptability of the Decision Support Tool(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Willingness to Use the Decision Support Tool at Future Visits(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Decisional Conflict - Uncertainty Subscore(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Decisional Conflict - Informed Subscore(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Decisional Conflict - Values Clarity Subscore(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Intention to Use Any HIV Prevention Method(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Confidence in Decision to Use an HIV Prevention Method(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Satisfaction With Information Received About HIV Prevention(Immediately post baseline visit)
- HIV Prevention Method Use (Any Method - Planned or New Method)(3 months post baseline visit)
- Acceptability of HIV Prevention Methods(Immediately post baseline visit)
- Recommend the Decision Support Tool(Immediately post baseline visit)