MedPath

Validation of Heart Rate Recovery as a Peri-operative Risk Measure

Recruiting
Conditions
Peri-operative Injury
Registration Number
NCT05561608
Lead Sponsor
University of Glasgow
Brief Summary

Is heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise (i.e. not to exhaustion) a valid risk measure for post-operative outcomes?

Detailed Description

There are approximately 1.5 million major operations carried out in the NHS every year. As the population ages, and surgical technique becomes more advanced, more patients are undergoing operations which carry a high risk of complications. Currently, doctors predict this risk by asking patients about medical problems and their level of physical fitness. If an operation is very high risk, a patient may undergo cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) where the patient rides an exercise bike to maximum effort (exhaustion) whilst their heart and lung function is measured. This gives the doctor specific numbers which can be discussed with the patient about the risk of complications after surgery. However, CPET is expensive and not all patients are able to do it, for example due to joint or circulation problems. Patients can also find attempting to reach maximal effort demanding and uncomfortable.

Heart rate recovery (HRR) after maximal exercise has been shown to indicate post-operative risk of complications, and is also related to life-expectancy in people with heart failure. The utility of HRR after submaximal exercise however has not been investigated as extensively. One group demonstrated that submaximal HRR predicts post-operative complications after lung surgery, and submaximal HRR also predicts life-expectancy in healthy individuals. There is less information about submaximal HRR as the methods of measuring it are not standardised. Previous work by our group has confirmed the reproducibility of submaximal HRR in a healthy population, and demonstrated different ways in which to measure it. We believe that submaximal HRR provides a "middle-ground" method of assessing how fit a patient is for surgery.

With informed consent, 95 patients across four hospitals in the West of Scotland will perform a step test pre-operatively. The step test will involve non-invasive measurement of the heart rate. Patients will exercise until approximately two-thirds of their predicted maximum heart rate is reached and then recover sitting, whilst the rate of their heart rate recovery is recorded. Patients will have pre- and post-operative troponin values measured (blood marker of strain/injury to the heart). Alongside the blood tests, patients will also answer questionnaires related to their quality of life, and information regarding other post-operative complications will be recorded.

Our study aims to demonstrate that submaximal HRR is predictive of post-operative myocardial injury (stress/injury to the heart wall due to the body's response to the operation) and that is it a valid measure when compared to the scores, blood tests and exercise tests that are currently in use in the NHS. In the future, submaximal exercise testing with HRR measurement may be offered to patients unable to perform CPET and will guide shared decision-making between patient, surgeon and anaesthetist to ensure the best outcome for the patient regarding their surgical options.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
95
Inclusion Criteria
  • Provision of informed consent
  • Age 50 years or over
  • Able to walk unaided
  • Planned elective intermediate/high risk surgery as defined by the ESC/ESA guidelines (i.e. >1% risk of mortality)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy
  • Ongoing participation in any investigational research which could undermine the scientific basis of the study
  • Presence of any of the American Thoracic Society's contraindications to exercise testing
  • Previous intermediate/high risk surgery within three months prior to recruitment
  • Previous participation in the VERVE study at any time

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Post-operative myocardial injury48 hours post-operatively

Post-operative troponin over the 99th centile upper reference limit plus a 20% change (increase or decrease)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Major adverse kidney events30 days post-operatively

Composite of renal mortality, renal replacement therapy, over 30% decline in eGFR from baseline

EQ-5D-5L30 days and 1 year post-operatively

Patient reported quality of life score

Length of hospital stay (with/without hospital mortality)Up to 1 year post-operatively
Acute Kidney Injury1 week post-operatively

As defined by KDIGO consensus

Cardiovascular complications7 days post-operatively

Incidence of myocardial infarction, cardiac death, non-fatal cardiac arrest, coronary revascularisation, pulmonary embolus, deep-veined thrombosis, or new onset atrial fibrillation

Major adverse cardiac events30 days post-operatively

Composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and coronary revascularisation

MortalityDay 30, day 90 and 1 year post-operatively
Infective complications7 days post-operatively

Presence of fever \<38.5 and clinical suspicion of infection

Neurological complications7 days post-operatively

Delirium or stroke

Pulmonary complications7 days post-operatively

Atelectasis, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary aspiration

Days alive and out of hospital30 days post-operatively
Readmission to hospitalWithin 30 days post-operatively
Quality of recovery scale - 152 days post-operatively
Admission/re-admission to Intensive Care14 days post-operatively

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Golden Jubilee National Hospital

🇬🇧

Clydebank, United Kingdom

University Hospital, Crosshouse

🇬🇧

Kilmarnock, United Kingdom

University Hospital Hairmyres

🇬🇧

East Kilbride, United Kingdom

Queen Elizabeth University Hospital

🇬🇧

Glasgow, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath