To evaluate and compare proximal contact tightness and contour of two different sectional matrix systems for Class 2 composite restoration.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K026- Dental caries on smooth surface
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/06/043116
- Lead Sponsor
- Shreya Volety
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 62
Inclusion Criteria
1.Unilateral Class 2 Carious lesions in
molars and premolars not extending beyond the axial line-angles and with an intact
adjacent tooth.
2.Teeth having two adjacent Class 2 carious lesions.
3.Vital permanent molars and premolars having class 2 carious lesions having no
symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patients with poor oral hygiene.
2. Patients with a diastema between posterior teeth as a result of any periodontal
problem.
3. Patients with severe periodontal disease and heavy bruxism with lost physiologic
contour.
4. Tooth indicated as an abutment for fixed partial denture and tooth having more
than grade 1 mobility.
5. Teeth with developmental anomaly or pathology or congenital defects.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The result will help us to know clinical outcome of matrix system that gives better proximal contact tightness and contour between Composi-Tight 3DXR <br/ ><br>Sectional Matrix System (Garrison’s Dental Solution) and Bioclear Biofit HD sectional <br/ ><br>matrix system in Class 2 Composite restorationsTimepoint: All samples will be taken at baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ot ApplicableTimepoint: Not Applicable