Perception of High Technology in Rehabilitation: a Prospective Real-life Study on Usability, Effectiveness, and Health-related Quality of Life (PHTinRehab Study)
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 84
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Short-term changes in Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The implementation of virtual reality (VR) and robotic devices in neuromotor rehabilitation has so far provided promising evidence in terms of efficacy throughout different clinical populations. Positive changes in patient's motor and functional outcomes were reported along with an increased autonomy in the activities of daily living (ADLs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The experience of use of these technological devices and their impact on the cognitive and psychosocial outcomes remain still unclear, though. Adopting a biopsychosocial approach, the present two-arm, parallel, non-randomized prospective quasi-experimental study protocol aims to explore the short- and long-term effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy (RAT) and of VR-based neuromotor rehabilitation. Pre-post intervention effects will be estimated and compared between a group of patients undergoing conventional treatment and another group additionally participating in technology-based rehabilitation. The evaluation will include patient's functional status (ie, motor functionality, autonomy in ADLs, risk of falls), cognitive functioning (ie, attention and executive functions), HRQoL, and psychological aspects (ie, anxiety and depression symptoms, quality of life satisfaction). After the treatment, devices usability and experience of use, along with the related psychosocial impact will be also assessed.
Detailed Description
Over the past two decades, the aging population and the related increase of acute and chronic diseases have led to the need for urgent healthcare solutions, including the implementation of interdisciplinary and innovative approaches in patients' care. Contextually, the field of neuromotor rehabilitation has shown deep interest in the deployment of robotic and virtual reality (VR) devices in recovery programs, given their multipurpose application.
Robot-assisted therapy (RAT) has reported promising evidence so far, showing advantages like the possibility to provide repetitive, intensive, and task-oriented rehabilitation activities, including the opportunity to implement smaller workforce, optimized exercise, and real-time quantitative motor assessment and monitoring. To date, diverse robot typologies (ie, exoskeletons, end-effectors, soft-robots) have been implemented to treat different chronic and complex diseases like acquired brain injury (ABI), spinal cord injury (SCI), multiple sclerosis (MS), and Parkinson's disease (PD) reporting evidence in favor of their feasibility and an improvement in patient functionality, autonomy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Likewise, VR has been shown to be a promising tool to enhance rehabilitation outcomes. When various technical devices (eg, head-mounted displays, motion capture and tracking systems) are implemented, it can deliver realistic experiences by interacting with virtual environments (VEs) closely resembling everyday environments. To date, plenty of studies have tested and demonstrated the efficacy, for example, of VR-treadmill trainings for lower limbs, to improve gait and balance, ultimately reducing risk of falls, or of exercises in reaching and grasping virtual objects to target arms and manual movement, dexterity, and coordination. Besides, thanks to the multimodal and multisensory stimulation it can provides, VR has revealed to be an effective tool to obtain significant changes in cognitive outcomes (eg, memory, visual attention, executive functions). Lastly, such stimulation has been shown to have potential for increased patient engagement in the rehabilitation program, ultimately improving treatment compliance.
Nevertheless, alongside the technological devices' complexity and the related clinical application, ensuring adequate patient engagement and adherence to treatment still represents an open challenge. Accordingly, the introduction of technology in rehabilitation programs has raised the issue of devices usability and experience of use. Usability specifically refers to a patient's perception and ability to use a device effectively, efficiently, and satisfactorily. Factors like device ease-of-use and learnability are therefore essential when aiming to achieve adequate technology acceptance rate. Such factors, however, do not always sufficiently explain the complexity of the experience of use. To better expand the concept of device use, socio-cognitive and experiential factors (eg, emotions, motivation, satisfaction) need to be considered too.
In light of the data in the literature, beyond motor and functional recovery what has been scarcely addressed up to date is the potential of RAT and VR to improve patient's psychosocial functioning. Moreover, to optimally enhance technological devices deployment in rehabilitation programs, a deeper understanding on their experience of use is increasingly needed.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Non Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •18 years of age or older;
- •Diagnosis of acquired brain injury (ABI) or Parkinson's Disease (PD) or total knee/hip arthroplasty.
Exclusion Criteria
- •severe clinical condition (ie, chronic heart failure [New York Heart Association Classification-IV - NYHA-IV], ischemic heart disease [Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification-IV - CCS-IV], neoplastic disease, acute respiratory disease);
- •severe cognitive impairment (MoCA ≤ 15.5);
- •language deficits;
- •severe mental health condition or psychiatric disorder compromising participation in the study;
- •absence or withdrawal of the informed consent to participate.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Short-term changes in Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) evaluates patient's autonomy to perform ADLs (ie, chair/bed transfer, ambulation, stair climbing, toilet transfer, bowel control, bladder control, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, feeding). Total scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher patient's autonomy.
Short-term changes in Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Functional Independent Measure (FIM) evaluates patient's disability level according to motor and cognitive subscores. Total scores range from 18 (complete dependence) to 126 (complete independence). Two subscores can be calculated: FIM motor (range 13-91) and FIM cognitive (range 5-35).
Short-term changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test evaluates patient's global cognition (ie, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, concentration, short-term and delayed verbal memory, working memory, language, orientation to time and space). Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive outcome.
Short-term changes in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT, oral version)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) evaluates speeded information processing, perceptual and motor speed, and visual scanning. Higher scores indicate better cognitive outcome.
Short-term changes in Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) evaluates executive functions (ie, conceptualization, verbal fluency, motor programming and executive control of action, self-regulation, resistance to interference, inhibitor control, environmental autonomy). Total scores range from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate better cognitive outcome.
Short-term changes in Stroop Colour Word Test
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Stroop Colour Word Test evaluates selective attention, cognitive flexibility and inhibition, and sensitivity to interference. Final score is obtained by computing the time interference effect (based on execution time) and the error interference effect (based on number of errors). Lower scores indicate better cognitive outcome.
Short-term changes in Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test evaluate phonemic fluency by asking the patient to generate as many words as possible beginning with a specific letter. Higher scores indicate better cognitive outcome.
Short-term changes in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) evaluates anxiety symptoms severity in the last 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety.
Client-Centred Rehabilitation Questionnaire (CCRQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Client-Centred Rehabilitation Questionnaire (CCRQ) evaluates patient's subjective experience of care in rehabilitation settings (ie, patient participation in decision making and goal setting, patient-centred education, evaluation of outcomes from the patient's perspective, family involvement, emotional support, co-ordination/continuity, physical comfort). Total scores range from 33 to 165. Higher scores indicate better rehabilitation experience.
The Experience in Technology-based Rehabilitation Schedule (ExTR)
Time Frame: 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Experience in Technology-based Rehabilitation Schedule (ExTR) is an ad-hoc questionnaire measuring patients' experience of use of the devices. Specifically, technology learnability, acceptability, usefulness, adaptability, adverse effects, engagement, enjoyment, safety, and perceived effectiveness. Total scores range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate better patient's experience of use of the devices.
Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4)
Time Frame: 6-month telephone follow-up (T2)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) evaluates patient's anxiety and depression symptoms severity in the last 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety and depression symptomatology.
Short-term changes in Timed Up & Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Timed Up \& Go Test measures patient's risk of falling, static and dynamic balance by estimating the time patient takes to stand up from an armchair, walk forward for 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair and sit down. The longer the time this takes, the higher the risk of falling.
Short-term changes in EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS) evaluates self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale (0: the worst health you can imagine; 100: the best health you can imagine). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Short-term changes in Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Short Form Survey-12 (SF-12) evaluates perceived physical health and mental health. Two subscores are generated, namely the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
Short-term changes in The Satisfaction-Profile (SAT-P)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Satisfaction-Profile (SAT-P) evaluates patient's satisfaction with three different domains associated with HRQoL (ie, mood, resistance to physical fatigue, and mental efficiency) evaluated on a 10-cm horizontal visual analogue scale ranging from "extremely dissatisfied" to "extremely satisfied" (in the last month). Higher rates indicate higher patient's satisfaction.
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The System Usability Scale (SUS) evaluates perceived device usability (ie, devices ease-of-use and learnability). Total scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher usability.
The telephone-based version of the MoCA (T-MoCA)
Time Frame: 6-month telephone follow-up (T2)
The telephone-based version of the MoCA (T-MoCA) evaluates patient's global cognition (ie, attention, short-term and delayed verbal memory, language, and orientation to time and space). Total scores range from 0 to 15. Higher scores indicate better cognitive outcome.
Short-term changes in Morse Fall Scale (MFS)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Morse Falls Scale (MFS) evaluates patient's risk of falls. Total scores ranges from 0 to 125 with higher scores reflecting a greater risk of falling.
Short-term changes in Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Trail Making Test (TMT) measures psychomotor speed and visual search attention (ie, visual scanning, graphomotor speed, and visuomotor processing speed), and executive functions (ie, working memory, inhibition control). TMT scores represent the time spent to complete the task and are provided in seconds. The higher the scores, the worse is the performance.
Short-term changes in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) evaluates depression symptoms severity in the last 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe depression.
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale (PIADS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale (PIADS) evaluates the psychosocial impact of the technological devices. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale. The score is meant to be either positive (+1, +2, +3 scores) or negative (-1, -2, -3 scores), with a central tendency marked as zero that indicates no perceived change after using the device. Higher scores reflect the technological device's stronger psychosocial impact
Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL)
Time Frame: 6-month telephone follow-up (T2)
The Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) evaluates patient's level of independence in the basic activities in relation to the daily environment (ie, bathing, dressing, toilet, continence, transferring, feeding). Total scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate higher patient's autonomy.
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time Frame: 6-month telephone follow-up (T2)
The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) evaluates the patient's level of independence in performing more complex and instrumental activities (ie, using the telephone, making purchases, cooking, housekeeping, doing laundry, handling money, using means of transport, responsibility for his/her own medications). Total scores range from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate higher patient's autonomy.
Long-term changes in EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS)
Time Frame: 6-month telephone follow-up (T2)
The EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS) evaluates self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale (0: the worst health you can imagine; 100: the best health you can imagine). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Long-term changes in Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: 6-month telephone follow-up (T2)
The Short Form Survey-12 (SF-12) evaluates perceived physical health and mental health. Two subscores are generated, namely the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Antonia Pierobon
Psychologist
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA