MedPath

Improving Perinatal Outcomes Among Kenyan Pregnant Women With an Integrated STI Testing Model

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Hiv
Sexually Transmitted Infections (Not HIV or Hepatitis)
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Xpert® CT/NG and TV testing
Registration Number
NCT06203951
Lead Sponsor
University of Washington
Brief Summary

The investigators will conduct a 3-arm individual-level RCT in Kisumu and Siaya, Kenya to compare perinatal outcomes associated with 3 models of STI testing and management in antenatal care. The investigators will enroll 3132 pregnant women and randomize 1:1:1 to receive standard-of-care (syndromic management only without CT, NG, or TV testing) vs. CT, NG, and TV testing using Xpert® assays universally vs. only among women without STI symptoms. All women with STIs detected and/or symptoms per Ministry of Health algorithms will receive immediate treatment, EPT per national guidelines, and tests of cure. All participants will be enrolled during routine antenatal care and followed through 9-months postpartum. The investigators will quantify and compare a composite outcome of pregnancy loss/stillbirth, PTB, LBW, SGA, and neonatal death, between randomization arms, in addition to several secondary and exploratory outcomes.

Detailed Description

In Aim 1, the investigators will conduct a 3-arm individual-level RCT in Kisumu and Siaya, Kenya to compare perinatal outcomes associated with 3 models of STI testing and management in antenatal care. The investigators will enroll 3132 pregnant women and randomize 1:1:1 to receive SOC (syndromic management only without CT, NG, or TV testing) vs. CT, NG, and TV testing using Xpert® assays universally vs. only among women without STI symptoms. All women with STIs detected and/or symptoms per Ministry of Health algorithms will receive immediate treatment, EPT, and tests of cure per national guidelines. All participants will be enrolled during routine antenatal care and followed through 9-months postpartum. The investigators will quantify and compare a composite outcome of pregnancy loss/stillbirth, PTB, LBW, SGA, and neonatal death, between randomization arms, in addition to several secondary and exploratory outcomes.

Antenatal clinic selection for RCT (Aim 1): The investigators conducted a landscape analysis of antenatal clinics in Kisumu and Siaya, Kenya as part of our team's ongoing PrEP studies. The investigators gathered data on the clients who attend antenatal care (e.g., HIV prevalence), the types of STI/HIV services offered (e.g., dual HIV and syphilis testing), and availability of the GeneXpert® platform. The investigators selected 9 high-volume clinics (\>350 antenatal clients annually); all clinics must provide syndromic STI management per national guidelines, have a laboratory that runs Xpert® assays, and provide a full range of antenatal services (e.g., syphilis and HIV testing). The investigators consulted with county health officials, facility in-charges, and laboratory staff, who have assured us that providing Xpert® STI testing on existing GeneXpert® machines in facilities is possible (see letters of support from County Health Directors).

Study population and eligibility criteria (Aim 1): 3132 pregnant women seeking antenatal care will be recruited from 9 routine ANC facilities in Kisumu and Siaya, Kenya, to participate in the randomized trial. Eligibility criteria include identifying as a cisgender woman, seeking antenatal care that day, planning to receive antenatal and postnatal care at that clinic, and being willing and able to provide informed consent. The investigators will not exclude clients who report intimate partner violence from enrolling in the study as they may especially benefit from STI services.76. The investigators will also not exclude women based on age, HIV status, or gestational age at enrollment to produce findings based on a study sample most representative of the underlying population of antenatal clients in the region as these data will be most useful for policy decisions.

Recruitment, screening and enrollment of antenatal clients (Aim 1): At each clinic, enrollment will occur over a 14-month period (\~25 antenatal clients enrolled per month, with seasonal variability) with an approximately 12-month follow-up period. Following registration at the clinic, study nurses will recruit clients and determine eligibility. Based on our recent studies in antenatal clinics in/near Kisumu, median gestational for clients seeking antenatal care is 24 weeks which is later than inclusion criteria of ongoing studies using Xpert® testing in other settings. Following screening consent, a brief form will capture age, HIV status, eligibility characteristics, and willingness to consent to join the study. Following written informed consent for participation, clients will be enrolled and assessed for demographic and behavioral characteristics, sexual history, education, marital status, income, relationship characteristics, HIV status, and clinical characteristics (e.g. pregnancy history, etc). Recruitment strategies will include collaborating with clinic staff and enrolled participants who will refer other clients who meet eligibility criteria. Recruitment materials will educate antenatal clients about STI risk based on available data, risks of having a partner of unknown STI status, and will emphasize the benefits of STI screening.

Randomization procedures (Aim 1): Randomization will occur following all routine antenatal procedures and enrollment into the study. Block randomization (1:1:1) in random sized blocks of no more than 9, stratified by recruitment site and HIV status at enrollment to ensure balance of arms within sites, will be overseen by the study biostatistician. Study nurses will be given randomly generated treatment allocations (SOC or universal testing or only asymptomatic testing) within sealed opaque envelopes. Once a participant has consented to enter the trial, an envelope will be opened, and the participant will be assigned the treatment allocation. The randomization code will be maintained by the Study Coordinator at the study site. Once assigned, the randomization allocation will be unblinded. To minimize the influence of the unblinded nature of the study on outcomes, ongoing data monitoring will not include information about endpoints disaggregated by site or arm. Only the study statistician will review data on study endpoints by arm or site.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
3132
Inclusion Criteria
  • Self-identifying as a cisgender woman
  • Seeking antenatal services from the clinic
  • Planning to receive antenatal and postnatal care at the clinic
  • Willingness to receive syndromic STI screening and HIV/syphilis testing per national guidelines
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent for participation
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Male gender
  • Not seeking antenatal services from the clinic
  • Not planning to receive antenatal and postnatal care at the clinic
  • Not willing to receive syndromic STI screening and HIV/syphilis testing per national guidelines
  • Not able or willing to provide informed consent for participation
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Universal TestingXpert® CT/NG and TV testingParticipants randomized to universal STI testing will be offered Xpert® CT/NG and TV testing regardless of symptoms, and they will receive a standard syndromic STI assessment.
Asymptomatic Only TestingXpert® CT/NG and TV testingParticipants randomized to the asymptomatic only testing will be offered Xpert® CT/NG and TV testing if no signs or symptoms of CT, NG, or TV are identified during STI assessment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Perinatal outcomes6 weeks postpartum

Binary endpoint (Yes/No) of a composite of fetal loss, PTB\<37 weeks gestation, SGA \<10th percentile, and neonatal death compared between randomization arms

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Maternal HIV incidence9 months postpartum

Frequency of HIV diagnosis at follow-up visits compared between randomization arms

EPT outcomes and factorsAt each follow up visit

Binary endpoint (Yes/No) of whether participant offered EPT to partner and if partner took EPT medications in intervention arm only

CT/NG/TV prevalence and cofactors6 weeks postpartum

Frequency of CT/NG/TV detection (Yes/No) at 6-weeks postpartum compared between randomization arms

Quality of CareAt each follow-up visit

Binary endpoints (Yes/No) based on MEASURE Evaluation's indicators for QOC in reproductive health (eg Did provider ask if you were having a problem with your FP method?) compared between randomization arms

Individual perinatal outcomes6 weeks postpartum

Binary endpoint (Yes/No) of fetal loss, PTB\<37 weeks gestation, SGA \<10th percentile, and neonatal death, separately, compared between randomization arms

Vertical HIV transmission9 months postpartum

Frequency of HIV diagnosis among infants born to WLHIV at follow-up visits compared between randomization arms

Antimicrobial resistence9 months postpartum

Binary endpoints (Yes/No) of NG antimicrobial resistance detected among any NG infections

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath