Comparison of the Acute Effects of Traditional versus Power Training on Metabolic, Cardiovascular and Psychophysiological Responses in Elderly Hypertensive Wome
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Systemic arterial hypertensionagedwomenC14.907.489M01.060.116.100M01.975
- Registration Number
- RBR-23h9cy
- Lead Sponsor
- niversidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Data analysis completed
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
hypertensive women; with above 60 years; without experience with RT in the previous six months.
Exclusion Criteria
Subjects with physical disabilities; diagnosis of diabetes; CVDs; hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 180 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 110 mm Hg); musculoskeletal disease; or who smoked; or abused drugs/alcohol.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Power training over traditional resistance training is expected to demonstrate better cardiovascular responses and lower oxidative stress;Systolic blood pressure was not statistically different (p > 0.05) between conditions at the beginning (118,53 mmHg) and during 30 min (124,33 mmHg) after sessions. Diastolic blood pressure, rate pressure product, and heart rate were not statistically different (p > 0.05) between conditions at the beginning (68,7 mmHg; 6790,5 bpm*mmHg; 62bpm) and during 45 min (71,99mmHg; 8715 bpm*mmHg; 70,43bpm) after sessions. Nitric oxide was significantly higher (p<0.0005) for PT (180,35µmol.L-1) compared to RT (117,14µmol.L-1) after 30 min of exercise. TBARS and TEAC were significantly higher (p<0.05) for PT (32,14µM; 307,28 µM) compared with RT (28,53 µM; 297,92 µM) only immediately after exercise. There were no differences for psychophysiological variables between protocols.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Secondary outcomes are not expected