Comparing one technique namely graded motor imagery with other technique namely pain neuroscience education in patients having frozen shoulder in terms of its impact on pain perception, severity, disability and range
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: M750- Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/08/072455
- Lead Sponsor
- College of Physiotherapy, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, University of Health Sciences, Rohtak
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Painful and restricted shoulder passive range of motion (primarily in external rotation).
Gradual onset and progressive worsening of pain and stiffness.
Stage 1 and 2 of frozen shoulder.
Individuals without diabetes mellitus.
Exclusion Criteria
Visually impaired subjects.
Pain and incomplete range of motion in both shoulders.
Previous neck or shoulder surgery.
Subacromial pain syndrome, painful arc syndrome and a positive apprehension test.
Any history of fracture, dislocation, or having any signs of neurological involvement.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain intensity with the numeric pain rating scale. <br/ ><br>Pain belief with pain catastrophizing scale. <br/ ><br>Shoulder disability with shoulder pain and disability index. <br/ ><br>Range of motion withuniversal goniometer.Timepoint: Day 0 <br/ ><br>Session 6 <br/ ><br>Session 12
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ilTimepoint: Nil