Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- Conditions
- Diabetic Retinopathy Visually Threatening
- Interventions
- Procedure: ILM PeelingProcedure: No ILM Peeling
- Registration Number
- NCT04380064
- Lead Sponsor
- Rush Eye Associates
- Brief Summary
Subject/Participant Groups:
Study Group: Subjects undergo internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during vitrectomy for the indication of tractional retinal detachment Control Group: Subjects do not undergo ILM peeling during vitrectomy for the indication of tractional retinal detachment
- Detailed Description
Hypothesis:
Subjects undergoing ILM peeling during vitrectomy will have lower central macular thickness on OCT, fewer postoperative epiretinal membranes, and thereby better final visual acuity to control subjects Randomization: Subjects will be randomized according to a coin toss during PPV, once Grade 2 or Grade 3 vitreoretinal adhesion has been determined: heads undergo ILM peeling, while tails do not.
Number of Subjects: With study power of 80%, a significance level of 0.05, a sample size of 60 patients for each group was calculated.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Study Group ILM Peeling Subjects undergo internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during vitrectomy for the indication of tractional retinal detachment Control Group No ILM Peeling Subjects do not undergo ILM peeling during vitrectomy for the indication of tractional retinal detachment
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative ERM Development 6 months Postoperative Epiretinal Membrane Development
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Acuity 6 months Rate of subjects achieving 20/50 or better Snellen visual acuity
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital La Carlota
🇲🇽Montemorelos, Nuevo Leon, Mexico