Using Three Different Final Irrigants and Showing Their Effects on the Success of Revascularization
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Post-operative Pain
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03591172
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
this study will assess different irrigating materials on the success revascularization of necrotic mature teeth associated with PRF.
- Detailed Description
Nano-propolis and Propolis will be used as final endodontic irrigants and will be compared to saline in Revascularization of necrotic mature teeth.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
Inclusion Criteria
- mature teeth.
- teeth with periapical periodontitis.
- Maxillary anterior teeth
- Patients should be free from any systemic disease
- Patients who will agree to the consent and will commit to follow-up period.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with immature roots.
- Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
- Patients with swelling. .Pregnant females. .Patients who could/would not participate in a 1-year follow-up. .Patients with fistula. .Patients with old age. .Teeth with periodontal involvement. .Teeth with vertical root fractures. .Non-restorable teeth.
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Nano-propolis Nano-propolis natural antibacterial, anti-inflammatory irrigation solution saline saline sodium chloride irrigation solution propolis Propolis natural antibacterial, anti-inflammatory irrigation solution
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method post-operative pain: Visual analogue scale 1 year post-operative pain evaluated using Visual analogue scale , 0 no pain, 10 severe pain.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method periapical healing 1 year evaluated radiographically
sensitivity 1 year electric pulp tester
survival 1 year clinical evaluation