跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03119909
NCT03119909Unknown不适用

Cognitive Adaptation and Frontal Cortex

Hospices Civils de Lyon2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2015年9月24日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
90
试验地点
2
主要终点
fMRI data

研究概览

简要总结

A hallmark of our survival in the real world and of our capacity to navigate the complex social interactions of human society is our ability to show behavioral adaptation. Adaptation can be necessary for a number of reasons, making the study of the process challenging. Two classes of event can signal a need for adaptation: 1) Events caused by one's own actions and specifically FeedBack -FB- from those actions (e.g. the investigators adapt their strategy after an erroneous choice), and 2) Events not linked to our actions, specifically Action-InDependent Events -AiDE- (e.g. the investigators adapt their strategy after a change of rule). These two types of information - FB and AiDE - will frequently occur concurrently. A critical and difficult part of adapting appropriately involves resolving the difference between the two. So for example an incorrect FB can occur because the investigators made an error, or because something unexpected in the environment has changed -the rule switched, someone cheated, etc. The Investigators must work out which it is, as they will frequently require different behavioral adaptations. Their task is made even more complex by the fact that the dynamics of evidence accumulation after FB vs AiDE are very different. FB has a direct temporal and causal link to an executed action, which means that the investigators are certain to derive information about a given action from a given FB. In contrast, AiDE have no such contiguity and no initial relation to actions, which means that the investigators must accumulate evidence to identify the appropriate adaptation to an AiDE. So the crucial dilemma is this: after an unwanted outcome, should the investigators adapt as if they made an error and received a negative FB, or should they continue to accumulate evidence as if there has been an AiDE to which they need to know how to adapt. Animals are able to resolve this credit assignment problem, as evidenced by their ability to appropriately adapt their behavior. A breakdown of this ability to link unexpected events to their correct cause would seem to be at the source of impairments in a wide range of psychological and neurological disorders, from addiction and OCD to psychological symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Yet the neural basis of this process is currently unknown, and FB and AiDE processing have been assessed separately so far. ADAPCO will provide unprecedented characterization of brain systems critically involved in learning from and adapting to FB, AiDE, and their interactions, thanks to fMRI studies.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Basic Science
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • being able to provide a written consent form
  • having a social insurance
  • have a normal vision (with or without corrections)
  • Right-handed

排除标准

  • Subjects with MRI contraindications (e.g. pacemaker, claustrophobia, metal in the body, etc...).
  • Subjects must be willing to be advise in case of discovery of brain abnormality.
  • History of neurological or psychiatric illness
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Persons under guardianship, curatorship or any other administrative or judicial measure of deprivation of liberty

结局指标

主要结局

fMRI data

时间窗: 3 years

BOLD signal will be analyzed in relation to the events of the task of all subjects. Images must be not too much distorted to allow data analysis. As such, if a subject moved too much (translation\>10mm; rotation\>5°) the corresponding data will be excluded from the analysis.

Behavioral data

时间窗: 3 years

Performance in the task will be assessed. Only subjects with performance in the task \>80% in the last functional run will be included in the final analysis.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验