MedPath

Open Labeled Placebo in Reducing Cancer Related Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Phase 2
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Recurrent Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Interventions
Other: Placebo Administration
Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Other: Waiting List
Registration Number
NCT03927885
Lead Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Brief Summary

This phase II/III trial studies an open labeled placebo to see how well it works compared with waitlist control in reducing cancer related fatigue in patients with cancer that has spread to other places in the body. A placebo is not a drug and is not designed to treat any disease or illness. Recent studies have found that cancer related fatigue symptoms in cancer survivors are improved with open labeled placebo (that is, patients know they are taking a placebo). It is not yet known how well an open labeled placebo works when compared with waitlist control in reducing cancer related fatigue.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the effects of open labeled placebo one tablet twice a day (OLP) compared to waitlist control (WLC) for reducing cancer-related fatigue (CRF) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) subscale in fatigued advanced cancer patients at the end of one week.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the preliminary efficacy open labeled placebo (OLP) and WLC on various fatigue dimensions - (Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory, MFSI-SF), depression (The Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression \[CES-D\]), cancer symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System \[ESAS\]), function and strength (six minute walk test, and 30-sec chair stand test), Global Symptom Evaluation (GSE), and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General \[FACT-G\]) in these advanced cancer patients.

II. To determine effects of OLP on fatigue symptom composite score (ESAS fatigue, pain and depression) at the end of 1st and 4th week.

III. To examine the adherence and safety for the OLP as treatment for cancer related fatigue.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive open labeled placebo orally (PO) twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression.

ARM II: Patients are assigned to a waiting list during week 1. Beginning in week 2, patients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient with a diagnosis of advanced cancer (metastatic or recurrent incurable solid tumors)
  • Presence of fatigue of >= 4/10 on Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Fatigue item (0-10 severity scale)
  • Patient should describe fatigue as being present for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to screening
  • Uncontrolled pain; patient is on opioids for the treatment of cancer pain, he/she must have had no major dose change (> 25%) for at least 48 hours prior to study entry. Change in opioid dose after study entry is allowed
  • Patient must be 18 years of age or older. The questionnaires used in this study have been validated only in the adult population
  • Patient must be willing to engage in telephone follow up with research staff
  • Patient must have telephone access to be contacted by the research staff
  • Hemoglobin level of >= 8 g/dL. Patient may receive packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion so as to have hemoglobin level of >= 8 g/dL so at participate in the study
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Surgery, or pain relieving procedures within 2 weeks of entry into the study or during the study period
  • Patients with history of substance abuse (Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye opener [CAGE] >= 2+), cognitively impaired (MD Anderson Symptom [MDAS] > 7)
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm I (open labeled placebo)Quality-of-Life AssessmentPatients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression.
Arm I (open labeled placebo)Questionnaire AdministrationPatients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression.
Arm II (waiting list, open labeled placebo)Waiting ListPatients are assigned to a waiting list during week 1. Beginning in week 2, patients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression.
Arm I (open labeled placebo)Placebo AdministrationPatients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression.
Arm II (waiting list, open labeled placebo)Quality-of-Life AssessmentPatients are assigned to a waiting list during week 1. Beginning in week 2, patients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression.
Arm II (waiting list, open labeled placebo)Placebo AdministrationPatients are assigned to a waiting list during week 1. Beginning in week 2, patients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression.
Arm II (waiting list, open labeled placebo)Questionnaire AdministrationPatients are assigned to a waiting list during week 1. Beginning in week 2, patients receive open labeled placebo PO BID for 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in cancer related fatigueBaseline up to 1 week

Will use t-tests to assess the mean changes and standard deviations from baseline to follow-up between the groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in function strengthBaseline up to 4 weeks

Will use t-tests to assess the mean changes and standard deviations from baseline to follow-up between the groups. The percentage of patients who report 'better' in each group will be reported. Will also compare the % of patients who report 'somewhat better' to "a great deal better" in each group and report the difference between groups (chi-square tests).

Changes in cluster composite scores of sleep disturbanceBaseline up to 1 week

The primary comparison will be using changes in cluster composite scores of sleep disturbance from baseline to end of week 1 between the placebo arm and waitlist control arm. Exploratory graphical analysis of the data will be done. If the assumptions of the t-test are violated, will use the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Changes in cluster composite scores of fatigueBaseline up to 1 week

The primary comparison will be using changes in cluster composite scores of fatigue from baseline to end of week 1 between the placebo arm and waitlist control arm. Exploratory graphical analysis of the data will be done. If the assumptions of the t-test are violated, will use the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Incidence of adverse eventsUp to 4 weeks

Will calculate the chi-square statistic to test the difference in adverse events between placebo group versus waitlist control group.

Change in quality of life (QOL)Baseline up to 4 weeks

Will use t-tests to assess the mean changes and standard deviations from baseline to follow-up between the groups. The percentage of patients who report 'better' in each group will be reported. Will also compare the % of patients who report 'somewhat better' to "a great deal better" in each group and report the difference between groups (chi-square tests).

Changes in cluster composite scores of painBaseline up to 1 week

The primary comparison will be using changes in cluster composite scores of pain from baseline to end of week 1 between the placebo arm and waitlist control arm. Exploratory graphical analysis of the data will be done. If the assumptions of the t-test are violated, will use the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Changes in cluster composite scores of depressionBaseline up to 1 week

The primary comparison will be using changes in cluster composite scores of depression from baseline to end of week 1 between the placebo arm and waitlist control arm. Exploratory graphical analysis of the data will be done. If the assumptions of the t-test are violated, will use the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

AdherenceUp to 4 weeks

Will use a chi-square to test the difference in adherence between each placebo group versus waitlist control group.

Change in Global Symptom Evaluation (GSE)Baseline up to 4 weeks

Will use t-tests to assess the mean changes and standard deviations from baseline to follow-up between the groups. The percentage of patients who report 'better' in each group will be reported. Will also compare the % of patients who report 'somewhat better' to "a great deal better" in each group and report the difference between groups (chi-square tests).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

M D Anderson Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath