Continuous Versus Demand-Based Oxygen in Patients With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Conditions
- Interstitial Lung DiseaseChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT06767904
- Lead Sponsor
- Sissel Kronborg-White
- Brief Summary
The goal of this randomised clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of exertional oxygen delivery by continous versus demand-based flow systems in patients with fibrotic Interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . The main questions it aim to answer:
Is there a difference in lowest oxygen saturation? Is there a difference in saturation: time below \<90%, pulse rate, distance and patient preferences ? It is a cross over study, so all patients will test both methods. Participants will perform 2 6-minute walk tests with the two different oxygen delivery systems.
- Detailed Description
The study design is a single center, randomized, open-label cross-over exploratory comparative study to investigate the efficacy of two different oxygen delivery systems. Patients with chronic obstructive Pulmonary disease or fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease that during a six-minute walk test can walk at least 50 m and desaturate below 88%, can be included in the study. The participants are performing 2 6-minute walk tests, randomized to perform the test with oxygen bottles or portable concentrators first. Primary endpoint is the difference in the lowest oxygen saturation between the two systems. Secondary endpoints are amongst others: difference in percentage of time and number of minutes when oxygen falls below 90%, mean and maximum pulse rate, distance and time taken to recover during the 6-minute walk test and scores from questionnaires. After 3-6 months, semistructured interviews will be done to record participants' experiences of ambulatory oxygen therapy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Verified diagnosis of fibrotic interstitial lung disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Desaturation < 88% during 6-minute walk test or currently receiving ambulatory oxygen by continous oxygen
- Able to walk at least 50 meters during a 6-minute walk test
- Self-reported stable respiratory symptoms in the previous 2 weeks
- Cognitively able to understand and participate in the study
- Written informed consent
- Any physical condition including paralysis, lower extremity pain, or other musculoskeletal problems limiting exercise performance
- Unstable heart condition or symptomatic stenotic valve disease
- Smoking during the previous 24 hours
- Pregnant women
- Anemia, Hb < 7.3 mmol/l (women) or < 8.3 mmol/l (men)
- Non-invasive ventilation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lowest oxygen At Baseline difference in the lowest oxygen saturation between the two different oxygen delivery systems during a 6-min. walk test.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Maximum pulse rate At baseline Maximum pulse rate during walk test
Distance At baseline Difference in walk test distance
time to recover At baseline The time taken to recover oxygen saturation after walk test to the level obtained at rest
percentage of saturation <90% At baseline Percentage of time when oxygen levels fall below 90% during walk test.
minutes of saturation <90% At baseline Number of minutes when saturation falls below 90% during walk test.
Pulse rate At baseline Mean pulse rate during walk test
minimum value of oxygen At baseline Minimum value of oxygen saturation during walk test
Maximal Borg scale At baseline Maximal rating of dyspnea on the Borg scale (Borg Rating of Percived exertion, range 0-10, where 10 is maximal breathing difficulty).
Change Borg scale At baseline Change in dyspnea from rest to end of the walk test measured by the Borg scale. (Borg Rating of Percived exertion, range 0-10, where 10 is maximal breathing difficulty)
Comfort Likert scale At baseline Comfort measured by a Likert scale on a scale from 1-7 where 1 equals strongly disagree and 7 equals strongly agree. There is no unabbreviated scale title.
comfort and frequency use oxygen After 3-6 months Questions regarding the use of the oxygen delivery systems with respect to comfort and frequency of use
Patient preference At baseline Patient preferences for the two different systems ("Which system do you prefer?"
Quality of life questionnaire score After 3-6 months Change on Quality of life questionnaires between baseline and three to six months
Reliability Likert scale At baseline Reliability measured by a Likert scale on a scale from 1-7 where 1 equals strongly disagree and 7 equals strongly agree. There is no unabbreviated scale title.
Semi structured qualitative interviews After 3-6 months Semi-structured qualitative interviews about patients' view on the different oxygen delivery systems
Baseline Characteristics After 3-6 months Associations between baseline characteristics and effect of and patient views on oxygen delivery systems
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.