An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Comparing High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen and Noninvasive Ventilation to Standard Oxygenation in Non-selected Intensive Care Unit Patients Admitted for Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure: The KISS Trial (Key Oxygenation Interventions in Surgical and Non-Surgical Patients)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Failure
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Enrollment
- 2100
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Day-28 mortality
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 12 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether one of the two oxygenation or ventilation strategies (NIV and/or HFNO) is superior to standard oxygen to reduce 28-day mortality rate in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients.
Detailed Description
This randomized controlled trial is a superiority study to test if one of the methods (NIV and/or HFNO) is superior to standard oxygen in ARF patients requiring oxygen. It is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, adaptive, three arms parallel-group trial with a computer-generated allocation sequence and an electronic system-based randomization, with a stratification on medical (then stratification between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients) versus surgical (then stratification between cardiothoracic and abdominal patients).
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult (age ≥ 18 years)
- •A diagnosis of hypoxemic ARF occurring defined as the presence and persistence for more than 30 minutes of hypoxemia (defined by a partial oxygen pressure \<60 mm Hg when breathing room air or \<80 mmHg when breathing 15 L/min of oxygen or a peripheral oxygen saturation \[SpO2\] ≤90% when breathing room air and/or a PaO2(partial pressure of oxygen)/FiO2 ratio \< 300 mmHg plus either \[1\] a respiratory rate higher than 30/min or \[2\] clinical signs suggestive of intense respiratory muscle work and/or labored breathing, such as use of accessory respiratory muscles, paradoxical motion of the abdomen, or intercostal retraction).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Contraindications to NIV and/or HFNO
- •Sleep apnea syndrome with home ventilator
- •Immediate tracheal intubation
- •Requirement for an emergent surgical procedure requiring intubation
- •Hypercapnia with a formal indication for NIV (formal indication for NIV with PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg or clinical signs of hypercapnia)
- •Isolated cardiogenic pulmonary edema (formal indication for NIV). Patients with pulmonary edema associated with another ARF etiology can be included.
- •Anatomical factors precluding the use of NIV and/or HFNO
- •Patients with limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies with a do-not-intubate order
- •Pregnancy in progress or planned during the study period or breastfeeding women
- •Patients protected by law (Art. L1121-6 and L1121-8 of the Code de la Santé Publique): Adult protected by law or patient under guardianship or curatorship
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Day-28 mortality
Time Frame: Up to Day-28
Mortality rates at Day-28
Secondary Outcomes
- Intubation rate at Day-28(Day-28)
- Intubation rate at Day-3(Day-3)
- Intubation rate at Day-7(Day-7)
- Oxygenation up to Day-7(Up to Day-7)
- Need of other rescue oxygen therapy up to Day-7(Up to Day-7)
- ICU length of stay(Up to Day-90)
- Hospital length of stay(Up to Day-90)
- Mortality rates in ICU(Up to Day-90)
- Mortality rates in hospital(Up to Day-90)
- Day-90 mortality(Day-90)
- Adverse events(Up to Day-90)