Comparison of Glidescope Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children Aged >1 Years
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 80
- Primary Endpoint
- Duration of Intubation
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the intubation time of Glidescope compared with Macintoch laryngoscope in pediatric patients, ease of intubation, and cardiovascular changes during intubation.
Detailed Description
This was a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in pediatric patients older than 1 years who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Time to endotracheal intubation was compared between patients intubated using a GlideScope® video laryngoscope, and those intubated by standard direct laryngoscopy. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the intubation time of Glidescope compared with Macintoch laryngoscope in pediatric patients, ease of intubation, and cardiovascular changes during intubation.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Other
- Masking
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 1 Year to 12 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA physical status I-II patients,
- •scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- •risk of pulmonary aspiration,
- •presence of difficult intubation,
- •emergency surgery,
- •cardiovascular disease,
- •respiratuar disease,
- •hemodynamic instability.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Duration of Intubation
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Time from laryngoscopy to intubation
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Canan Tulay ISIL
M.D.
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital