跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05491174
NCT05491174已完成不适用

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Randomised Controlled Trial, Examining a Transdiagnostic DBT-informed Skills Group Intervention Delivered by Protocolised Based Intervention Facilitators (P-BIFS) for Adults in Community Mental Health Settings

King's College London1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 44 人开始时间: 2022年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
44
试验地点
1
主要终点
Feasibility - Adherence to group intervention.

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators propose to evaluate a new protocol-based intervention that is informed by Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT), known as a DBT-informed intervention, delivered in routine mental health settings within South London and Maudsley NHS foundation trust. The intervention is delivered to a group of transdiagnostic service users with a severe mental illness (SMI). It is delivered by a junior workforce who will be referred to as Protocol-Based Intervention Facilitators (P-BIFs). Successful delivery by a less expert workforce has potential to increase routine implementation, compared to delivery by expert staff, where costs of both salary and training are higher.

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) is a type of psychological treatment recommended for people with a diagnosis of emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD). Individuals with a diagnosis of EUPD commonly experience difficulties with managing and responding to their emotions. This is known as emotion dysregulation. Difficulties with emotion dysregulation are thought to play a role in many mental health difficulties. The evidence base for using interventions that are informed by DBT, known of as DBT informed interventions with other mental health diagnoses, is emerging.

The current research aims to investigate whether it is possible (feasible) to conduct a randomised control trial evaluating the transdiagnostic DBT-informed skills group for individuals representative of SMI presentations seen within community mental health settings. The study will also examine whether it is possible for junior staff to deliver the manualised group intervention.

Service user participants will be randomised to either a 10-week DBT-informed intervention delivered by the P-BIFs, or a waitlist. Those on the waitlist will access the intervention once their involvement in the study has ended. The study will last for up to 1 year. The maximum duration to complete trial participation from consent to completion will be 18 weeks.

It is hypothesized that the DBT informed intervention, delivered by junior staff, will be feasible and acceptable with this client population.

详细描述

Primary objectives of the research are:

  1. To determine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a double-arm randomised control trial (RCT) of a transdiagnostic Dialectical Behavioural Therapy informed (DBT-informed) group intervention within secondary care mental health settings.
  2. To determine feasibility and acceptability of training Protocol Based Intervention facilitators (P-BIFs), to deliver the intervention as per the protocol.

Feasibility will be measured using pre-specified criteria.

A secondary objective is to explore change in assessment scores between the treatment and control group.

The research will utilise an experimental, open-label double-arm randomised design investigating feasibility. Service user participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the waitlist control group using randomisation software. Pairwise randomisation will be used whereby participants will be randomised in pairs for an approximately equal number of participants in each arm.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Feasibility - Adherence to group intervention.

时间窗: Through group intervention, 10 weeks.

Completion of the group intervention is operationalised as attending 50% or more of the groups. Green: Intervention completed by ≥80% of participants. Percentage of participants considered to have completed the group is considered feasible to conduct large scale RCT Amber: Intervention completed by between 41-79% of participants. Explore methods of increasing intervention completion rates before proceeding to large scale RCT Red: Intervention completed by ≤40% of participants. Percentage of participants considered to have completed the group not considered feasible to conduct large scale RCT

Feasibility - Satisfaction Questionnaire

时间窗: at 18 weeks

'Neutral' ratings and positive ratings of 'agree' and 'strongly agree' will indicate acceptability of the intervention. Satisfaction questionnaire (SQ) adapted for the current research. The brief measure consists of 5 questions that are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with total score ranging from 5 to 25 where a higher score indicates a higher level of satisfaction. The questionnaire also provides space to enter free text.

Feasibility - Recruitment to the target sample of 30 participants

时间窗: Within 5 months.

Predetermined count data: a. Recruitment to the target sample of 30 participants (15 per arm).

Feasibility - Recruitment to the target sample of between 5 and 10 P-BIFS

时间窗: within 5 months.

Predetermined count data

Feasibility - Retention rates

时间窗: Through participant pathway, on average 18 weeks.

Progression criteria for retention rates will be evaluated using a 'traffic light system'. Green: Retention rate of ≥80%. Retention rates are considered feasible to conduct large scale RCT Amber: Retention rate between 41-79%. Explore methods of increasing retention rates before proceeding to large scale RCT Red: Retention rate ≤40%. Retention rates are not considered feasible to conduct large scale RCT

Feasibility - Outcome measure completion rates

时间窗: Through participant pathway, on average 18 weeks.

Green: Completion of ≥80%. Completion rates of outcome measures are considered feasible to conduct large scale RCT Amber: Completion between 41-79%. Explore methods of increasing outcome measure completion rates before proceeding to large scale RCT. Red: Completion ≤40%. Completion rates of outcome measures are not considered feasible to conduct large scale RCT

Feasibility - P-BIF adherence to intervention protocol

时间窗: Week 10 of DBT-informed intervention

Adherent delivery is defined as meeting ≥90% of checklist. P-BIF attendance at supervision will be recorded as an additional measure of treatment adherence. Green: ≥90% of all sessions rated as adherent. Attending ≥90% of supervision sessions Amber: Between 80- 89% of all sessions rated as adherent. Attending 80-89% of supervision sessions Red: ≤79% of all sessions rated as adherent. Attending ≤79% of supervision sessions

次要结局

  • Change in scores on the Clinical Outcomes of Routine Evaluation -10(Between week 1 and week 18)
  • Change in score on Distress Tolerance Scale(Between week 1 and week 18)
  • Change in ratings on DIALOG Scale(Between week 1 and week 18)
  • Change in scores on Difficulties with Emotional Regulation Scale- 16(Between week 1 and week 18)
  • Change in scores on DBT- Ways of Coping Checklist - DBT Skills Subscale(Between week 1 and week 18)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Mental Health Intervention for Transdiagnostic... | 临床试验