Evaluation of the Functional Outcomes After Bilateral, 3D Ultrasound-guided Focal Thermal Ablation of the Prostate Transition Zone, in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-related Obstruction
- Conditions
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Interventions
- Procedure: Targeted Microwave Ablation
- Registration Number
- NCT06212453
- Lead Sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Brief Summary
The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy of transperineal focal microwave ablation (TMA) of the prostate transition zone as a new treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) within a prospective single-institutional pilot study.
- Detailed Description
Transurethral resection of the prostate, laser vaporization or enucleation, and simple open prostatectomy represent the current gold standard surgical interventions for BPH-related obstruction. However, these treatments are burdened by their invasiveness, intra and post-operative morbidity, and long-term complications, including ejaculatory dysfunction (70%), urethral strictures (7%), urinary incontinence (2%), and bleeding. Laser-based surgical strategies have only partially overcome these drawbacks.
To provide a personalized therapy for the treatment of BPH related-symptoms, several minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) were developed with the aim of achieving outcomes comparable to the gold standard invasive procedures while minimizing SD and other complications. Urolift implants and Rezum system have demonstrated less complication rate and hospitalization time than standard surgeries.
Recently, 3D ultrasound-guided transperineal focal microwave ablation (TMA) was developed as a focal treatment for localized prostate cancer. Ultrasound-MRI image fusion was performed with organ-based tracking-registration using KOELIS Trinity™ (Koelis, Meylan, France). Microwave thermal ablation was provided by the TATO generator (Biomedical Srl, Firenze, Italy) using a single 17G needle inserted transperineally. This treatment was reported to be safe, precise, and feasible in an outpatient setting.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 22
- Man over 40 years old
- Indication of surgical management for BPH
- Prostate volume ≥30 cc and ≤100 cc as evaluated by ultrasonography
- IPSS score ≥15
- Qmax ≤12 ml/s
- Affiliated to the French national social security system
- Patient suitable for IV sedation or general anesthesia and focal microwave ablation
- Wish and able to comply with planned visits
- Able to express his consent
- Signed informed consent form
- Unwillingness to accept the treatment
- Neurological pathology responsible for micturition disorders
- History of prostatic surgery
- History of prostatic arterial embolization
- Prostate protrusion Index of grade 2 (>5 mm) or more as evaluated by ultrasonography.
- Stenosis of the urethra
- History of prostate cancer
- History of radiotherapy or pelvic surgery
- Life expectancy <2 years
- Inability to understand the informed consent document, to give consent voluntarily or to complete the study tasks.
- Participation in another clinical study involving an investigational product within 1 month before study entry.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description patients with BPH Targeted Microwave Ablation Targeted Microwave Ablation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference between IPSS score at baseline and at 3 months 3 months The International Prostate Symptom Score IPSS is a self-questionnaire - It contains seven questions about symptoms related to BPH and one question about the patient's perceived quality of life.
The seven questions are scored from 0 to 5. The sum of the 7 items gives the International Prostate Symptom Score in terms of severity (out of 35):
0-7 Mildly symptomatic - 8-19 Moderately symptomatic - 20-35 Severely symptomatic - Efficacy of the intervention with a decrease of at least 6 points on IPSS score between 3 months and baseline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Length of hospital stay 1 month Need for postoperative bladder catheterization 1 month Qmax 1, 3 and 12 months to assess urinary tract symptoms
Patients perspectives and treatment preferences Baseline Characterization of patient motivation to undergo TMA at baseline, as assessed by the patient perspective questionnaire
Duration of postoperative bladder catheterization 1 month Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) 1, 3 and 12 months to assess urinary tract symptoms
Postoperative pain two hours after surgery Visual analogue scale (1 to 10)
Dimensions of transitional zone tissue ablation 7 days Measurement on prostatic mpMRI performed at day 7
Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-ejaculatory dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD-SF) 1, 3 and 12 months 4 items to assess ejaculatory functions This score is based on 3 questions concerning symptoms (score from 1 to 15) and one question about discomfort (score from 0 to 5).
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) 1, 3 and 12 months 15 items to assess ejaculatory functions and global sexual life - This score is based on 3 questions concerning symptoms (score from 1 to 15) and one question about discomfort (score from 0 to 5).
IPSS score 1, 3 and 12 months to assess urinary tract symptoms - 0-7 Mildly symptomatic 8-19 Moderately symptomatic 20-35 Severely symptomatic
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hôpital Cochin
🇫🇷Paris, France