Compared the success rate between Direct Laryngoscope and Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in Emergency Department: RCT
Phase 3
Completed
- Conditions
- compared the 1st attempt success of intubation between video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopeVDO laryngoscope,Video laryngoscopy,Macintosh video laryngoscope,Macintosh Direct laryngoscope,Airway management in Emergency Department
- Registration Number
- TCTR20200503003
- Lead Sponsor
- Ramathibodi hospital Mahidol university
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 158
Inclusion Criteria
patient age more than 18 years old and met intubation criteria, participant group
Exclusion Criteria
patient who sign Do not resuscitation or end of life care
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The 1st attempt intubation success not more than 150 second n (%)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The 2nd attempt intubation success not more than 150 second n (%),mean time duration of intubation not more than 150 second mean/ median time,Cormack-Lehane view of intubation not more than 150 second n (%),Cormack-Lehane view of intubation not more than 150 second n (%)