MedPath

Compared the success rate between Direct Laryngoscope and Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in Emergency Department: RCT

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
compared the 1st attempt success of intubation between video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope
VDO laryngoscope&#44
Video laryngoscopy&#44
Macintosh video laryngoscope&#44
Macintosh Direct laryngoscope&#44
Airway management in Emergency Department
Registration Number
TCTR20200503003
Lead Sponsor
Ramathibodi hospital Mahidol university
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
158
Inclusion Criteria

patient age more than 18 years old and met intubation criteria, participant group

Exclusion Criteria

patient who sign Do not resuscitation or end of life care

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The 1st attempt intubation success not more than 150 second n (%)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The 2nd attempt intubation success not more than 150 second n (%),mean time duration of intubation not more than 150 second mean/ median time,Cormack-Lehane view of intubation not more than 150 second n (%),Cormack-Lehane view of intubation not more than 150 second n (%)
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath