Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02768597
NCT02768597
Completed
Not Applicable

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing The Outcome of Large-Diameter vs Small-Diameter Glenospheres in Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using the ReUnion System

Mayo Clinic1 site in 1 country113 target enrollmentApril 2016

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Glenohumeral Joint Degeneration
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Enrollment
113
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Shoulder Abduction Strength
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study will compare the outcome of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Stryker ReUnion System with implantation of either a large (40 mm) or a small (36 mm) glenosphere with either a +2 mm or a +6 mm offset.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2016
End Date
December 15, 2022
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mark E. Morrey, M.D.

Principal Investigator

Mayo Clinic

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects willing to sign the informed consent
  • Male and non-pregnant female subjects ages 50 - 90 at the time of surgery
  • Subjects requiring a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  • Subjects with the diagnosis of cuff-tear arthropathy (CTA), massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (MRCT) or osteoarthritis (OA) with marked posterior subluxation or bone loss

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to comply with follow-up requirements
  • Subjects with inflammatory arthritis
  • Subjects with proximal humerus fractures
  • Subjects with sequels of trauma
  • Subjects that are immunologically compromised
  • Subjects with an active or suspected latent infection in or about the shoulder
  • Need to add a tendon transfer
  • Need for structural humeral bone graft
  • Pregnant subjects

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Shoulder Abduction Strength

Time Frame: one year

Shoulder abduction strength was measured using manual testing where strength was graded as: (1) paralysis; (2) contraction with no ability to resist gravity; (3) weak but able to resist gravity; (4) weak but able to resist the examiner; (5) normal.

Active Forward Elevation of the Shoulder

Time Frame: One year

Degrees of movement the participant is able to independently lift arm upward to the ceiling, while keeping elbow straight. Normal movement for forward elevation is 180 degrees.

Active External Rotation of the Shoulder

Time Frame: One year

Degrees of movement the participant is able to independently rotate arm up, while keeping arm at 0 degrees of abduction. Normal movement for external rotation is 90 degrees.

Shoulder External Rotation Strength

Time Frame: One year

Shoulder external rotation strength was measured using manual testing where strength was graded as: (1) paralysis; (2) contraction with no ability to resist gravity; (3) weak but able to resist gravity; (4) weak but able to resist the examiner; (5) normal.

Shoulder Internal Rotation Strength

Time Frame: One year

Shoulder internal rotation strength was measured using manual testing where strength was graded as: (1) paralysis; (2) contraction with no ability to resist gravity; (3) weak but able to resist gravity; (4) weak but able to resist the examiner; (5) normal.

Secondary Outcomes

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Questionnaire(One year)
  • Patient Satisfaction(One year)
  • Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) Questionnaire(1 year)
  • Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire(One year)
  • Shoulder Pain(One year)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials