Comparison between fascial treatment and high velocity low amplitude (HVLA) treatment in patients with chronic neck pai
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- M54.92
- Registration Number
- DRKS00010398
- Lead Sponsor
- niversität Hamburg Fakultät für Psychologie und BewegungswissenschaftInstitut für BewegungswissenschaftArbeitsbereich Sport- und Bewegungsmedizin
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
agw 30 to 65 years of age; average neck pain intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) should have been >2 within the last three months; (c) present of at least one segmental dysfunction of the cervical and/or upper thoracic spine; (d) present of at least one restrictive fascia of the neck
Exclusion Criteria
systemic conditions, such as cancer, severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus, any neurological conditions, any kind of manual therapy of the neck within the last four weeks, surgery of the cervical or thoracic spine in the past, whiplash in the past, surgery of the neck and/or cervical spine in the past, contraindication for HVLA.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Self-reportet pain by visual analog scale (VAS), before and after each treatment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Self-reportet Pain (VAS), Self-reportet functionality by Neck Pain Disability Questionnaire (NPAD), Range of motion of the cervical spine by CROM Device before and after each treatment (=4 time points)