Comparison of landmark versus ultrasound guided technique for spinal anesthesia in obese patients.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: U07-U07- Provisional assignment of new diseases of uncertain aetiology or emergency use (U00-U49)
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/05/066666
- Lead Sponsor
- Kalariya Parthikkumar Mansukhlal
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
BMI more than 27 kg/m2, patients undergoing surgery under neuraxial block, patients giving valid informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
patient refusal, Patients with spinal deformity, neurological diseases, coagulation disorders, local infections, unstable hemodynamics
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to evaluate mean difference of puncture attempts and success rate of dural puncture on first needle insertion attempt in ultrasound guided and landmark guided technique for spinal anaesthesia in obese patients.Timepoint: baseline, 4 month, 6 month
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to compare both groups in terms of <br/ ><br> Lumar puncture time from skin puncture to csf outflow <br/ ><br> adverse events or complications following dural punctureTimepoint: baseline, 4 months, 6 months