MedPath

Improving Recovery After Orthopaedic Trauma: Cognitive-Behavioral Based Physical Therapy (CBPT)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Lower Extremity Injury
Registration Number
NCT03335657
Lead Sponsor
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Brief Summary

The goal of the CBPT study is to determine the efficacy of the CBPT program for improving outcomes in service members and civilians at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Primary outcome is physical function measured through a patient-reported questionnaire and physical performance tests. Secondary outcomes include pain and general health. Tertiary outcome is return to work/duty.

Detailed Description

Following extremity injury, referral (and direct access) to physical therapy (PT) is considered standard of care. And, while PT strategies are commonly impairment focused, clinicians across multiple subspecialties of physical therapy recognize the importance of addressing pain and pain-related psychosocial factors as strong predictors of chronic pain as well as long-term physical and psychological disability.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions have documented positive influence on psychosocial factors in patients with chronic pain. CBT-based self-management programs have also demonstrated improvement in patient outcomes and the adoption of a physically active lifestyle, as well as improvement in fear-avoidance beliefs and self-efficacy, in various populations with chronic conditions. These evidence-based CBT and self-management strategies provide the basis for the study intervention.

The proposed project will conduct a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of the CBPT program in patients at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Central hypothesis is that delivery of CBPT by physical therapists over the telephone will improve outcomes, through reductions in pain catastrophizing and fear of movement and improvement in pain self-efficacy. The investigators propose a large, rigorous evaluation of the CBPT program in patients with lower extremity trauma with the goal of engaging civilians and service members in their own care and improving pain and functional outcomes.

Specific Aim 1 To determine the efficacy of the CBPT program for improving outcomes in service members and civilians at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Primary outcome is physical function measured through a patient-reported questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include physical performance tests, pain and general health. Tertiary outcome is return to work/duty.

Specific Aim 2 To determine whether changes in the intermediary outcomes of pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and self-efficacy at 6 months are associated with improvement in outcomes 12 months after hospital discharge.

Specific Aim 3 To determine whether subgroups of patients are more likely to benefit from the CBPT program.

Specific Aim 4 To examine the value of CBPT relative to Education using Markov decision-analysis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
633
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Physical Function- self-reported capability to carry out activities12 months

Physical Function measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ Physical Function (short form) domain to assess one's ability to carry out activities that require a combination of skills, often within a social context. This instrument has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 40 which represents the worse outcome. The lowest possible score is 8 and it represents the better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Physical Function-Leg Strength, Endurance, and Mobility12 months

Leg Strength, Endurance, and Mobility measured through the Sit to Stand Five Times

Physical Function- Gait Speed12 months

Gait Speed measured through 10-Meter Walk test. Each individual will have time scores

Pain_ self reported12 months

Pain measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ Pain Intensity (short form) Domain at 12-months following hospital discharge. This tool has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 15 which represents the worse outcome. The lowest possible score is 3 and it represents the better outcome.

Physical Function- Mobility and Power12 months

Mobility and Power measured through the Timed Stair Ascent test. Each individual will have time scores based on performance. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

General Health12 months

General Health measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ General Health Domain at 12-months following hospital discharge.This instrument has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 50 which represents the better outcome. The lowest possible score is 10 and it represents the worse outcome.

Physical Function- Balance and Agility12 months

Balance and Agility measured through the Four Square Step test. Each individual will have time scores based on performance. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

Florida Orthopaedic Institute

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Methodist Hospital

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

🇺🇸

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Carolinas Medical Center

🇺🇸

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Vanderbilt Medical Center

🇺🇸

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

San Antonio Military Medical Center

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Florida Orthopaedic Institute
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.