Comparison of Conventional vs Microsurgical Method for Root Coverage by Lateral Displacement Flap
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession, Localized
- Sponsor
- Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences & Research Centre
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- vertical depth of recession
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to assess the evaluation of micro and Macro surgical approach in the treatment of grade II gingival recessions using the laterally repositioned flap
Detailed Description
In this study total, 30 patients were selected The patients initially received a comprehensive periodontal examination and complete plaque control program including oral hygiene to eliminate habits related to the aetiology of recession. Scaling, root planning and occlusal adjustments were done The patients were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. Group A and Group B. Patients with miller class II were treated with a laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using conventional macrosurgical approach (15patients) and microsurgical approach(15patients) The clinical parameters evaluated were height of gingival recession relative clinical attachment level which was measured as the distance from a fixed point in a stent to the bottom of the pocket and gingival biotype at baseline, 3 months and 6 months period
Investigators
Dr.A.Kranthi
PG Student
Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences & Research Centre
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 20-50 yrs
- •ClassII gingival recession
- •Vital teeth that were free from caries or inadequate restorations
- •Sufficient width of attached gingiva
Exclusion Criteria
- •Any systemic diseases and smokers
- •ClassI,III\&IV gingival recession
- •Abnormal frenal attachments
- •Interdental bone loss with tooth mobility
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
vertical depth of recession
Time Frame: Change in level of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
The height of gingival recession: From cementoenamel junction to the free gingival margin.
Secondary Outcomes
- horizontal width of recession(Change in horizontal dimension of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.)