Effectiveness of Programed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Interval 90 (EI90) of 10 ml, 0.0625% Bupivacaine Plus 2 μg/mL Fentanyl interval90(EI90)of10ml,0.0625%Bupivacaine Plus 2μg/mL Fentanyl
- Conditions
- Labour Pain
- Interventions
- Device: programed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90)
- Registration Number
- NCT05441085
- Lead Sponsor
- Menoufia University
- Brief Summary
Multiple studies showed the numerous advantages of implementing programmed epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, where a fixed volume of local anesthetic is automatically administrated at a set time interval compared to the continuous epidural infusion technique (CEI). The advantages were improved maternal satisfaction, decreased local anesthetic consumption, and decreased second stage of labor.The theory behind PIEB is that to attain a more uniform spread of local anesthetic in the epidural space a higher volume of injectate and a higher pressure is needed.Different approaches using different timings and volumes for PIEB have been proposed to achieve the optimal regimen. Many studies showed evidence that 10 mL boluses of bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL delivered every 40 min, named effective programed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90), produced effective analgesia without breakthrough pain in 90% of nulliparous women during the first stage of labor.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Patients of ASA physical status 2-3 with a singleton pregnancy
- gestational age > 37 weeks
- regular uterine contractions occurring at least every 5 min;
- cervical dilation 2-5 cm
- pain > 5 (Visual analogue score (VAS) 0-10) at the time of request for epidural analgesia .
- Refusal to concent
- Contraindication to epidural analgesia as allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or fentanyl
- Patients who had opioids or sedatives within 4 h preceding epidural insertion.
- Unintentional dural puncture.
- Patient who deliver within 1 h after initiation of epidural clinician bolus.
- The inability to achieve as VAS score ≤2 after the initial loading dose will be considered as a failure and will be excluded from the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Multiparous programed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90) Patients of ASA physical status 2-3 with a singleton pregnancy; gestational age \> 37 weeks; regular uterine contractions occurring at least every 5 min; cervical dilation 2-5 cm; and pain \> 5 Nulliparous programed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90) Patients of ASA physical status 2-3 with a singleton pregnancy; gestational age \> 37 weeks; regular uterine contractions occurring at least every 5 min; cervical dilation 2-5 cm; and pain \> 5
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method adequate labour analgesia six hours Time of first call for bolus dose of epidural After loading dose
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Side effects 24 hours Presence of side effects as neusea, vomiting,peruritis
Upper sensory block 24hours Secsensory block level to ice
Motor block 24 hours Motor block measured by bromage scale
Total anaesthetic volume 24 hours Total volume of local anesthetic used
Visual Analogue Scale to pain 24 hours As zero is no pain and 10 is the maximum pain that can be felt
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Faculty of Medicine Menoufia University
🇪🇬Cairo, Governorate, Egypt
Rabab Habeeb
🇪🇬Cairo, Governorate, Egypt