MedPath

Effectiveness of Programed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Interval 90 (EI90) of 10 ml, 0.0625% Bupivacaine Plus 2 μg/mL Fentanyl interval90(EI90)of10ml,0.0625%Bupivacaine Plus 2μg/mL Fentanyl

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Labour Pain
Interventions
Device: programed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90)
Registration Number
NCT05441085
Lead Sponsor
Menoufia University
Brief Summary

Multiple studies showed the numerous advantages of implementing programmed epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, where a fixed volume of local anesthetic is automatically administrated at a set time interval compared to the continuous epidural infusion technique (CEI). The advantages were improved maternal satisfaction, decreased local anesthetic consumption, and decreased second stage of labor.The theory behind PIEB is that to attain a more uniform spread of local anesthetic in the epidural space a higher volume of injectate and a higher pressure is needed.Different approaches using different timings and volumes for PIEB have been proposed to achieve the optimal regimen. Many studies showed evidence that 10 mL boluses of bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL delivered every 40 min, named effective programed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90), produced effective analgesia without breakthrough pain in 90% of nulliparous women during the first stage of labor.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients of ASA physical status 2-3 with a singleton pregnancy
  • gestational age > 37 weeks
  • regular uterine contractions occurring at least every 5 min;
  • cervical dilation 2-5 cm
  • pain > 5 (Visual analogue score (VAS) 0-10) at the time of request for epidural analgesia .
Exclusion Criteria
  • Refusal to concent
  • Contraindication to epidural analgesia as allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or fentanyl
  • Patients who had opioids or sedatives within 4 h preceding epidural insertion.
  • Unintentional dural puncture.
  • Patient who deliver within 1 h after initiation of epidural clinician bolus.
  • The inability to achieve as VAS score ≤2 after the initial loading dose will be considered as a failure and will be excluded from the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Multiparousprogramed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90)Patients of ASA physical status 2-3 with a singleton pregnancy; gestational age \> 37 weeks; regular uterine contractions occurring at least every 5 min; cervical dilation 2-5 cm; and pain \> 5
Nulliparousprogramed intermittent epidural bolus interval 90 (EI90)Patients of ASA physical status 2-3 with a singleton pregnancy; gestational age \> 37 weeks; regular uterine contractions occurring at least every 5 min; cervical dilation 2-5 cm; and pain \> 5
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
adequate labour analgesiasix hours

Time of first call for bolus dose of epidural After loading dose

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Side effects24 hours

Presence of side effects as neusea, vomiting,peruritis

Upper sensory block24hours

Secsensory block level to ice

Motor block24 hours

Motor block measured by bromage scale

Total anaesthetic volume24 hours

Total volume of local anesthetic used

Visual Analogue Scale to pain24 hours

As zero is no pain and 10 is the maximum pain that can be felt

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Faculty of Medicine Menoufia University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Governorate, Egypt

Rabab Habeeb

🇪🇬

Cairo, Governorate, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath