comparative study between two respiratory support machine namely, CPAP(continuous positive airway pressure), HHHFNC(heated and humidified high flow nasal cannula)as a respiratory support mode in babies coming out of mechanical ventilator
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- post extubated infants from mechanical ventilator, ventilated due to respiratory cause
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2017/03/008070
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Mihir Sarkar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 27
Inclusion Criteria
1.Infants excluding neonates.
2.Mechanically ventilated due to respiratory cause.
3.Fulfilling extubation criteria as per standard PICU protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Infants who were mechanically ventilated due to causes other than respiratory.
2.Having associated neurological impairment.
3.Having associated heart disease.
4.Having major congenital/chromosomal anomaly.
5.Declining to give informed consent.
6.Immunocompromised patient.
7.Patient having chronic respiratory problem like cystic fibrosis, follow up of BPD
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number of extubation failure, ,comparation between Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument.Timepoint: 72 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method comfort score comparation, total length of PICU stay, Nasal injuryTimepoint: comfort score 12 hourly for 72 hours, total length of PICU stay in days, Nasal injury at 72 hours.