Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2020/05/025414
CTRI/2020/05/025414Not yet recruitingPhase 2

Effect of Gua Sha v/s Cryostretch technique on pain and function with Plantar fasciitis: A randomised clinical trial.

Aditi Jadhav1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: May 30, 2020Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Numeric pain rating scale
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The objective of my study is to study and compare the effectiveness of gua sha and cyrostretch technique on subjects with plantar fascitis. There will be 40 participants divided into two groups of 20 subjects in each group. They will recieve the treatment with other conservative treatment for plantar fasciitis.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Other
Masking
Participant Blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Presence of any one of the following criteria: Painful first step in morning.
  • •Calcaneal soreness on palpation.
  • •Pain on palpation along the proximal plantar fascia.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Subjects with recent history of fracture or surgery in and around the ankle joint.
  • •Congenital deformity of foot.
  • •Subjects with open wounds, infections.
  • •Bone malignancy.
  • •Sensory impairment.
  • •Skin hypersensitivity.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Numeric pain rating scale

Time Frame: Baseline and post 1 week of intervention

Foot function index

Time Frame: Baseline and post 1 week of intervention

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pressure algometer(Baseline and post 1 week of intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor
Aditi Jadhav
Sponsor Class
Other [self]

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the Effect of Graston Technique and Static Stretching in AthletesPhysical Therapy
NCT06009406Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University30
Completed
Not Applicable
Spray Stretch Technique Versus Sustain Pressure for Trapezius TriggersTrigger Point Pain, MyofascialMechanical Neck Pain
NCT04559906Riphah International University54
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of three different stretching techniques on hamstring length.Musculoskeletal disorders.Other disorders of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue
IRCT201110255112N3Semnan University of Medical Sciences80
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Conservative Treatment and Graston and Cup Applications in Patients With Cervical Disc HerniationCervical Disc HerniationNeck Pain
NCT06003907Uskudar University27
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Stretching and Strengthening Exercises in Patients With Frozen ShoulderFrozen Shoulder
NCT06469502Istanbul University56