跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03451981
NCT03451981已完成不适用

Evaluation of the Adjunctive Use of Er:YAG Laser or Erythritol Air-polishing in the Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis: a RCT

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 47 人开始时间: 2018年12月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
47
试验地点
2
主要终点
probing pocket depth changes

研究概览

简要总结

Peri-implantitis is an important disease entity as a result of its high prevalence and the lack of a standard mode of therapy.

Non-surgical therapy of peri-implant disease, especially when bone loss is not high, appears to be partially effective in resolving the disease. In several cases, however, only limited improvements have been reported in the main clinical parameters (bleeding at the survey and presence of the pocket) and there is a clear tendency to relapse of the disease.

In these cases it is therefore recommended to consider adjunctive therapies. Numerous approaches have been used for implant surface decontamination including mechanical, chemical and treatments by means of air-powder or laser.

The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial will be to assess the efficacy in improving clinical parameters of two further methods of implant surface decontamination (Er:YAG laser or air-abrasive device) after mechanical cleaning during non surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

详细描述

Peri-implantitis, defined as an inflammatory lesion in the surrounding peri-implant tissues with loss of supporting bone, is an important disease entity as a result of its high prevalence and the lack of a standard mode of therapy. Although the current epidemiological data are limited, peri-implantitis affects 28-56% of the subjects and 12-43% of the implants.

Numerous approaches have been used for implant surface decontamination during peri-implant surgery, including mechanical, chemical and laser treatments. Using conventional mechanical means, eradication of pathogens on implant surfaces with threads and often with rough surface structures is difficult. Treatment models, such as debridment, effectively used to treat teeth with periodontitis, cannot be used in the same way on rough threaded implant surfaces. The implant rough surface structure also provides the bacteria with ''protected areas'', inaccessible to conventional mechanical removal.

A treatment protocol that may offer an advantage over traditional mechanical treatment includes the use of laser therapy. Data have shown that treatments with Er:YAG lasers have a bactericidal effect. Er:YAG laser treatment can debride the implant surface effectively and safely. Slightly better clinical results in terms of bleeding on probing and clinical attachment level have been reported by Er:YAG laser treatment as compared with traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement with curette and chlorhexidine.

The air abrasive method for the removal of bacterial plaque on tooth surfaces has also been used in the treatment of peri-implantitis, demonstrating no relevant adverse effects. Until recently, air-polishing devices have used a slurry of water and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and pressurized air/water. A less abrasive method using an amino acid glycine has been proven to be effective in removing bacterial biofilm structures in deep periodontal pockets and safe by not causing emphysema. Moreover the use of a glycine-based powder does not seem to cause titanium implant surface changes.

The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial will be to assess the efficacy in improving clinical parameters of two further methods of implant surface decontamination (Er:YAG laser or air-abrasive device) after mechanical cleaning during non surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • presence of at least one screw-type titanium implant exhibiting bleeding and/or suppuration on probing combined with:
  • a PPD ≥ 5 mm and bone loss > 2 mm (compared to crestal bone levels at the time of placement of the reconstruction)
  • a PPD ≥ 6 mm and bone loss ≥ 3 mm (not compared to crestal bone levels at the time of placement of the reconstruction)
  • single tooth and bridgework restorations without overhangings
  • no evidence of occlusal overload (i.e. occlusal contacts revealed appropriate adjustment)
  • implant function time ≥ 1 year.

排除标准

  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes,
  • patients with osteoporosis or under bisphosphonate medication,
  • pregnant or lactating women,
  • patients with a history of radiotherapy to the head and neck region
  • patients with incapability to perform basal oral hygiene measures due to physical or mental disorders
  • hollow implants
  • implant mobility
  • implants at which no position could be identified where proper probing measurements could be performed;
  • previous surgical treatment of the peri-implantitis lesions

结局指标

主要结局

probing pocket depth changes

时间窗: baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

changes in probing pocket depth, measured from the mucosal margin to the bottom of the pocket

次要结局

  • Bleeding on probing changes(baseline,1, 3, 6 months)
  • endpoint of therapy(1,3,6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Marco Clementini

Principal Investigator

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验