Open Versus Laparoscopically-assisted Esophagectomy for Cancer
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: Laparoscopically-assisted esophagectomy
- Registration Number
- NCT00937456
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Lille
- Brief Summary
To compare laparoscopically-assisted gastric mobilization versus open gastric mobilization in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, with open thoracic approach in the 2 arms.
- Detailed Description
Open Versus Laparoscopically-assisted Esophagectomy for Cancer
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 207
- Squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus T1, T2, T3, N0-N1, M0, before any treatment
- Middle or lower third esophageal carcinoma, junctional tumor Siewert type I
- Patients who underwent or not neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation
- Tumor deemed to be resectable in a curative intent at the preoperative setting
- Age less than 75 years old, OMS status 0, 1 or 2
- Patient who can undergo one or the other surgical modality
- Written informed consent form
- Possible follow-up
-
General criteria: PO2 ≤ 60 mmHg; PCO2 > 45 mmHg; FEV ≤ 1000 ml/sec
- Hepatic cirrhosis
- Recent myocardial infarction (in the previous 6 months) or progressive coronary disease
- Distal arteritis (Leriche-Fontaine stage II upwards)
- Concomitant cancer, other than subcarinal esophageal cancer
-
Disease-related factors
- Invasion of subclavicular lymph nodes in a clinical examination or on biospy
- Lymph nodes near the origin of the celiac artery with a diameter ≥ 1 cm on CT or that appear to be suspect on endoscopic ultrasound (to differentiate them from the paracardial or left gastric lymph nodes, which does not constitute an exclusion criterion)
- Recurrent nerve palsy
- Evidence of extension to the tracheobronchial tree
- Signs of mediastinal invasion (vertebral contact, aortic contact ≥ 90°, or invasion of nonresectable neighboring organs such as the aorta, trachea, main bronchi, etc.)
- Distant metastasis
-
Laparoscopy-related factors
- Patient presenting a general contraindication to laparoscopy
- A history of median or subcostal laparotomy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Laparoscopically-assisted esophagectomy Laparoscopically-assisted esophagectomy Laparoscopically-assisted esophagectomy: standard abdominal procedure of gastric mobilisation but through laparoscopic route. Right thoracotomy as usual. Open esophagectomy Laparoscopically-assisted esophagectomy Conventional open esophagectomy: Esophagectomy with extended 2-field lymphadenectomy through laparotomy and right thoracotomy (Ivor-Lewis standard procedure)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To decrease postoperative major 30-days morbidity from 45% in the open arm to 25% in the laparoscopically-assisted arm. 30 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method quality of life 2 years overall survival 2 years disease free survival 2 years economical interest of the surgical technique apprehended through a hospital point of view 6 months overall morbidity 30 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (11)
Hopital Ambroise Pare Ap-Hp
🇫🇷Boulogne Billancourt, France
Hopital Du Haut Leveque
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
Hopital Louis Mourier
🇫🇷Colombes, France
Hotel Dieu
🇫🇷Clermont Ferrand, France
Hopital de La Croix Rousse
🇫🇷Lyon, France
Hopital St Marguerite Ap-Hm
🇫🇷Marseille, France
Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
🇫🇷Strasbourg, France
Hopital Purpan
🇫🇷Toulouse, France
Hopital St Louis Ap-Hp
🇫🇷Paris, France
Hopitalpontchaillou
🇫🇷Rennes, France
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
🇫🇷Paris, France