Effect of Timed-Restricted Eating on Metabolic Health
- Conditions
- Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseObesityInsulin Resistance
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Early time restricted eatingBehavioral: Late time restricted eating
- Registration Number
- NCT06061042
- Brief Summary
We aim to determine the effect of combined isocaloric time restricted eating and meal timing on metabolic health, liver fat, functional brain networks, inflammation, and sleep pattern/quality in subjects with obesity and insulin resistance.
- Detailed Description
Obesity is an alarming global health issue, with increasing prevalence. Obesity leads to a vast array of disorders, including dyslipidemia, the accumulation of intrahepatic triglycerides (IHTG), multiorgan insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, disruption of the circadian rhythm (circadian misalignment), which is associated with irregular eating schedules, is an important risk factor for the development of obesity, IHTG and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Time restricted eating (TRE) is a form of intermittent fasting, in which the daily eating period is restricted. The beneficial effect of this type of diet might relate to adequate synchronization of food intake and fasting to the internal rhythm of the circadian tissue clocks, improving metabolic handling of nutrients and metabolic flexibility.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Ability to provide informed consent;
- BMI > 30kg/m^2;
- Insulin resistance, as defined by fasting plasma insulin > 62 pmol/L and/or prediabetes, as defined by fasting plasma glucose > 5.3 and < 7.0 mmol/L;
- Stable weight for 3 months prior to study inclusion
- For women, 1 year after last menstrual cycle
- Use of any medication, except for those related to treatment of metabolic syndrome;
- Any medical condition interfering with study outcomes or design;
- History of any psychiatric disorder, including eating disorders;
- Performing shift work
- Performing intensive sports (>3 hours/week);
- Smoking;
- Drugs abuse or alcohol abuse (>3 units/day);
- Contraindication for MRI;
- Known lactose/gluten intolerance;
- Known soy, egg, milk or peanut allergy;
- Childhood onset of obesity
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Early time-restricted eating Early time restricted eating * 50% of daily calories at breakfast, 35% at lunch and 15% at dinner. 85% of calories consumed in 6h, i.e., between 7AM and 1PM. * Eating period, 10h (7AM-5PM); fasting period, 14h; Breakfast between 7 and 8 AM; lunch between 12 AM and 1 PM; dinner between 4 and 5 PM. Late time-restricted eating Late time restricted eating * 15% of daily calories at breakfast, 35% at lunch and 50% at dinner. 85% of calories consumed in 6h, i.e., between 2PM and 8PM. * Eating period, 10h (10AM-8PM), fasting period, 14h; Breakfast between 10 and 11 AM; lunch between 2 and 3 PM; dinner between 7 and 8 PM.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Insulin Sensitivity Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will use the Oral Minimal Model Method in conjunction with a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) to quantitatively evaluate insulin sensitivity. Concentrations of insulin, glucose, and C-peptide will be measured during the course of the MMTT to serve as the requisite inputs for the model. The output is in dl/kg/min/uU/ml.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in plasma glucose Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 Fasted and stimulated glucose (mmol/L) will be measured during MMTT
Change in beta cell function (C-peptide) Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 Fasted and stimulated C-peptide (nmol/L) will be measured during MMTT
De novo lipogenesis Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 Fasted and stimulated de novo lipogenesis (DNL) will be measured during the MMT as 2H incorporation into fatty acids following deuterated water (2H2O) administration
Change in intrahepatic fat Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 To quantify the intrahepatic fat content, a single voxel 1H-MRS (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) will be used. Relative fat content will be expressed as the ratio of the fat peak over the cumulative fat and water peak. This will also be corrected for T2 relaxation.
Immunological markers Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will conduct immune cell phenotyping on whole blood samples to identify and categorize various immune cell types. Additionally, we will assess immune cell function and metabolism in isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Inflammatory markers will also be assessed in serum samples to provide a comprehensive overview of immune and inflammatory status.
Change in insulin aignaling Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 Biopsies will be taken from skeletal muscle and subcutaneous fat to measure key proteins in the insulin signalling pathway (Western blots)
Change in glucose variability Baseline 1 to week 4 for intervention 1, Baseline 2 to week 12 for intervention 2 In our study, we will deploy Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) to acquire an in-depth understanding of glucose variability in participants throughout the course of the intervention. These monitors gauge glucose concentrations in the interstitial fluid (mmol/L), serving as a reliable proxy for blood glucose levels. This approach will enable us to assess key metrics such as mean, minimum and maximum glucose levels.
Psychological factor - Food Craving Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will use the General Food Cravings Questionnaire (G-FCQ) to evaluate the frequency and intensity of food cravings among participants. The scoring for the G-FCQ ranges between 21 and 105, with higher scores indicative of more pronounced food craving tendencies.
Psychological factor - Food addiction Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will use the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (YFAS 2.0) to assess addictive behaviours. The YFAS 2.0 is designed in accordance with the DSM-5 criteria, and its scoring system mirrors the number of DSM-5 criteria fulfilled indicative of addiction.
Change in plasma insulin Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 Fasted and stimulated insulin (pmol/L) will be measured during MMTT
Physical activity Baseline 1 to week 4 for intervention 1, Baseline 2 to week 12 for intervention 2 Physical activity will be assessed via accelerometry. Accelerometry represents the magnitude of acceleration in any direction, over a predefined epoch.
Psychological factor - Impulsiveness Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will use the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) to scale impulsiveness towards food. This will help us understand how impulsivity might influence dietary behaviour. The score ranges from 30-120 and a higher score leans towards greater impulsivity.
Functional brain activity Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 Brain activation maps and functional connectivity will be assessed by blood oxygen dependent signals in the resting state and after visual food cues using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Iowa gambling computational task Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We use the Iowa gambling task to assess decision-making and risk-reward sensitivity. Participants choose cards from four decks, each with different reward and punishment rates, aiming to maximize their winnings. We use this task to study risk taking and impulsive behaviour.
Psychological factor - Eating behaviour Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will utilize the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (NVE) to assess and categorize the eating behaviors and tendencies of our participants. The NVE discerns three distinct eating styles: emotional eating, external eating, and restrained eating. A higher score within a specific style suggests a predominant inclination towards that particular eating behavior.
Psychological factor - Hunger scale Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will employ a nine-question visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess hunger. Each question will be scored 0-100.
Delay discounting computational task Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 The delay discounting task aids in understanding the decision-making processes that might contribute to overeating and poor food choices. In this task, we will be able to measure the ability of each individual to delay immediate gratification for a greater future reward.
Psychological factor - Chronotype Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 To determine natural sleep-wake patterns, we will use the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). This tool offers a comprehensive understanding of sleep behaviors, revealing a chronotype.
Subject experience with intervention Baseline 1 and week 4 for intervention 1; Baseline 2 and week 12 for intervention 2 We will employ a semi-structured oral interview as part of our qualitative approach to understand our participants' experience and adherence to the intervention.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
đŸ‡³đŸ‡±Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands