comparison of post operative pain after use with two different taper rotary files in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R52- Pain, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: K040- Pulpitis
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/06/034479
- Lead Sponsor
- SGT University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 130
Inclusion Criteria
1. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with moderate to severe pain.
2.Normal periapical view, that is without any periapical lesion.
3. No systemic diseases.
4. Needing selective one visit treatment in mandibular 1st& 2ndmolar
Exclusion Criteria
1. In patient where tooth is un restorable, inadequate length, poor periodontal status.
2. Patient with pulp necrosis, periapical radiolucency , sinus tract, periapical abscess.
3. Patient with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms contribute to post-operative pain in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis?
How do 4% and 6% taper rotary files compare to standard manual instrumentation in pulpitis pain management?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict differential response to endodontic instrumentation tapers in pulpitis patients?
What adverse events are associated with 4% vs 6% taper rotary file use in symptomatic pulpitis cases?
How do 4% and 6% taper rotary files influence inflammatory mediators in post-operative pulpitis pain pathways?