Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02234804
NCT02234804
Unknown
Not Applicable

The Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) Recross Study

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby3 sites in 3 countries60 target enrollmentJuly 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Coronary Disease
Sponsor
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Enrollment
60
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Cross sectional stent strut malapposition in the main vessel bifurcation segment facing the side-branch ostium compared for optical coherence tomography and angioguided recrossing strategy
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Prospective, controlled, double randomized, non-blinded, multicenter, investigator initiated, academic superiority trial comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided vs. angiography guided wire recrossing in jailed side branches (SB) (1. randomization 1:1)(superiority) and comparing Medtronic Resolute Integrity and Xience Prime for stent strut apposition in the SB ostium (2. randomization 1:1) (superiority). Acute primary endpoint and 30 days clinical follow-up.

Hypothesis: OCT guided wire recrossing in bifurcation stenting results in less malapposed struts in the segment facing the SB ostium.

Secondary hypothesis: Treatment by Medtronic Resolute Integrity stent results in less malapposed struts at the bifurcation segment compared to treatment by the Abbott Xience Prime stent.

Detailed Description

Purpose: To assess the ability of OCT to guide wire recrossing and reduce stent strut malapposition after kissing balloon dilatation. To compare stent strut apposition after treatment by two different stent designs using both guiding strategies of wire recrossing.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2013
End Date
February 2017
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Niels Ramsing Holm

MD

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Stable or unstable angina pectoris or silent angina pectoris.
  • De novo coronary bifurcation lesions at "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "right coronary artery (RCA)- posterior descending artery (PDA)/posterolateral branch" or "left main (LM)/Cx/LAD".
  • All Medina classes except Medina 0.0.
  • Diameter of side branch ≥2.5 mm.
  • Diameter stenosis \>50% by operator's visual assessment
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • ST-elevation infarction within 48 hours.
  • Side branch lesion length \>5 mm.
  • Expected survival \< 1 year
  • Severe heart failure (NYHA≥III)
  • S-creatinine \>120 µmol/l.
  • Allergy to Contrast media, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor, Ticlopidine, Everolimus or Zotarolimus.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Cross sectional stent strut malapposition in the main vessel bifurcation segment facing the side-branch ostium compared for optical coherence tomography and angioguided recrossing strategy

Time Frame: Baseline

Secondary Outcomes

  • Procedural: 1. Success in recrossing into designated strut hole when visible and indicated(Baseline)
  • Optical coherence tomography endpoints: Distance between malapposed strut and vessel wall in all segments for stent type and recross strategy(Baseline)
  • Procedural: 2. Procedure duration (sheath insertion to closure device excluding treatment of other vessels)(Baseline)
  • Procedural: 3. Contrast use(Baseline)
  • Optical coherence tomography endpoints: Malapposition in the proximal and distal main vessel segments and in the quadrants opposite to the side branch origin for stent type and recross strategy(Baseline)
  • Optical coherence tomography endpoints: Minimum expansion of the stents expressed as absolute area and percentage of the closest reference area, for stent type and recross strategy(Baseline)
  • Optical coherence tomography endpoints: 5. Malapposition in the main vessel segment limited by and facing the side-branch ostium compared for stent type (second randomization)(Baseline)
  • Optical coherence tomography endpoints: Ostial stent area stenosis by optical coherence tomography (side branch reference area by 3D QCA)(Baseline)
  • Minimal luminal area of all segments(Baseline)
  • Angiographic area stenosis of all other segments(Baseline)
  • Procedural: 4. Fluoroscopy time(Baseline)
  • Angiographic endpoints: Segmental assessment; Proximal edge, proximal main vessel, bifurcation segment, distal main vessel, distal edge, ostial 5 mm of side branch. Pre and post side branch intervention(Baseline)
  • Ostial side branch area stenosis(Baseline)
  • Ostial side branch acute gain after main vessel (MV) stenting(Baseline)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials